Magnetotelluric and audiomagnetotelluric measurements in Finland

Ádám, A.; Kaikkonen, P.; Hjelt, Sven‐Erik; Pajunpää, K.; Szarka, L.; Verő, J.; Wallner, Adelheid

doi:10.1016/0040-1951(82)90254-2

Cited by 30 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The first deep EM work in the research area was done by Ádám et al (1982). Kaikkonen & Pajunpää (1984) presented a 2‐D conductivity model constructed from 1‐D interpretations of 140 scalar audiomagenetotelluric (AMT) soundings (3700–8 Hz).…”

Section: Area Of Interest: Geological Background and Geophysicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

High-resolution magnetotelluric studies of the Archaean-Proterozoic border zone in the Fennoscandian Shield, Finland

Vaittinen

Korja

Kaikkonen

et al. 2012

Geophysical Journal International

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

S U M M A R YThe Archaean-Proterozoic collisional zone is a complex mixture of the Archaean complexes [e.g. Iisalmi Complex (IC)], Proterozoic supracrustal belts [e.g. Kainuu Belt (KB) and Savo Belt (SB)] and oceanic arc lithologies in the central Fennoscandian Shield. The zone was formed in the Savo orogeny when the Keitele microcontinent collided with the Archaean Karelian craton in the Palaeoproterozoic time. The crustal architecture of this palaeosuture is studied using new broad-band magnetotelluric data from 104 sites. 2-D conductivity models across the border zone between the Palaeoproterozoic Svecofennian Domain and the Archaean Karelian province are constrained using the recent, partly collocated reflection seismic data from the Finnish Reflection Experiment (FIRE). Dimensionality analyses, in particular the Q-function analysis, show that magnetotelluric data represent reasonably well regional 2-D structure at periods <100 s, which is the longest period used in this study. Strike determinations gave a stable strike of N15W. For the inversions, the data are projected into three parallel profiles with an azimuth of N75E. The determinant inversion is selected as the most suitable method for the data set. Especially the phase data are useable only from the determinant since one of the polarizations have the out-of-quadrant phase at several sites. The interpreted final, geological more appropriate models, where smoother thick conductive areas are replaced by thinner layers, are constructed from the results of the unconstrained smooth inversions with the help of forward modelling, synthetic and prior model inversions and reflection seismic models. The two major sets of crustal conductors are identified. They have an opposite dip and together they form a bowl-shaped conductor. In the west, the eastward dipping SB conductors are located at the bottom of the formation underlain by the Keitele microcontinent. The SB conductors extend to the east possibly cutting the westward dipping conductors of the KB. The conductive KB is flanked above and below by the resistive Archaean IC/Rautavaara and Eastern Finland Complexes and represents the remnants of a basin that was squeezed between two Archaean blocks in the collision. The crustal conductors revealed by the inversion extend to the surface, where they can be associated with the near-surface conductors mapped by airborne electromagnetic surveys. Geological mapping has shown that the near-surface conductors are caused by graphite and/or sulphide-bearing metasedimentary rocks. Thus the deep conductors related with the Proterozoic KB and SB were formed on the surface and transported into the upper and middle crustal levels in the Savo orogeny. The crust in the Karelian Craton is highly resistive having only minor resistivity variations in our research area. Also the Archaean lower crust is resistive on the contrary to the conductive lower crust of the Proterozoic SB and the Keitele microcontinent.

show abstract

Section: Area Of Interest: Geological Background and Geophysicsmentioning

confidence: 99%