2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022ja030770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetospheric Reconnection and Geomagnetic Storms: A Personal Perspective

Abstract: At INPE I joined a research group that had started studying astrophysical X-ray sources by performing X-ray measurements with proportional counters onboard rockets in collaboration with a research group from the Space Sciences Laboratory (SSL) of the University of California at Berkeley. Thus, in June 1969 I participated in a rocket campaign of that kind at the rocket launching facility in Natal, located at the equatorial region of Brazil, with the aim of measuring X-rays from the astronomical X-ray source Sco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, one could explore in future studies the fundamental differences among largely geoeffective and short‐lived magnetic field structures, especially located in an (ICME)Sheath and leading into an intense auroral activity as that studied by Ohtani (2022), and geoeffective structures with longer durations, located either in the Sheath or in the Driver regions of an ICME leading into intense geomagnetic storm‐activity (e.g., Gonzalez et al., 1994; Gonzalez, 2022). Among those differences, for the former structures one can expect that: (a) externally‐driven aspects of magnetospheric activity should be dominant due to their short‐lived nature (Dai et al., 2020; Ohtani, 2022); (b) their related magnetospheric energization does not lead into a sufficiently strong‐ring current intensification due to the short duration of the driving processes (Ohtani, 2022) and (c) their related reconnection process and associated magnetospheric dynamics need to be regarded and studied as strongly time‐dependent phenomena.…”
Section: Additional Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, one could explore in future studies the fundamental differences among largely geoeffective and short‐lived magnetic field structures, especially located in an (ICME)Sheath and leading into an intense auroral activity as that studied by Ohtani (2022), and geoeffective structures with longer durations, located either in the Sheath or in the Driver regions of an ICME leading into intense geomagnetic storm‐activity (e.g., Gonzalez et al., 1994; Gonzalez, 2022). Among those differences, for the former structures one can expect that: (a) externally‐driven aspects of magnetospheric activity should be dominant due to their short‐lived nature (Dai et al., 2020; Ohtani, 2022); (b) their related magnetospheric energization does not lead into a sufficiently strong‐ring current intensification due to the short duration of the driving processes (Ohtani, 2022) and (c) their related reconnection process and associated magnetospheric dynamics need to be regarded and studied as strongly time‐dependent phenomena.…”
Section: Additional Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%