2013
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/456/1/012003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetoresistance in a High Mobility Two-Dimensional Electron System as a Function of Sample Geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3] it was assumed that the peak around zero magnetic field is given by scattering at the edges in the ballistic regime, similar to the quenching of the Hall effect [12,13]. Our analysis of the strong negative magnetoresistance for different length-to-width ratios shows that the peak is independent of the geometry [14], in contrast to the recent observation [15] for similar samples. In particular, we would also expect the peak to be larger for higher electron densities if it would depend on the ratio between classical cyclotron orbit and geometry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 43%
“…[3] it was assumed that the peak around zero magnetic field is given by scattering at the edges in the ballistic regime, similar to the quenching of the Hall effect [12,13]. Our analysis of the strong negative magnetoresistance for different length-to-width ratios shows that the peak is independent of the geometry [14], in contrast to the recent observation [15] for similar samples. In particular, we would also expect the peak to be larger for higher electron densities if it would depend on the ratio between classical cyclotron orbit and geometry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 43%
“…13,14 In high-mobility 2DEGs, negative magnetoresistances are usually observed around zero magnetic field. 7,[15][16][17][18][19] These negative magnetoresistances normally consist of a temperature independent peak around zero magnetic field and a temperature dependent huge magnetoresistance at larger magnetic fields both with a parabolic magnetic field dependence. 15 A shoulder in the longitudinal resistivity marks the crossover between these different effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28] Later the formula of Hall viscosity was derived that depends on scattering time. 18,24 Experimentally viscous transport has been observed in GaAs, [19][20][21][22]38 Graphene, 11 P dCoO 2 , 36 and W P 2 . 37 The ultraclean sample of GaAs has mobility µ ∼ 10 7 cm 2 V s at low temperature and therefore allows both viscous and ballistic transport.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature dependent negative magnetoresistance in GaAs is explained by the viscous transport. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] This is an interesting fact that temperature dependence of negative magnetoresistance in GaAs survives even when interparticles scattering length is greater than device size, l M C l S > 1. 23 In the presence of time reversal symmetry this should depend on the sample size being in the ballistic region of charges transport.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%