2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-022-2047-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetohydrostatic modeling of the solar atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Anfinogentov et al (2019) reported that the magnetic field strength at the base of the corona in an active region could reach 4000 Gauss. Radio observations have also been applied to magnetic field measurements in flaring structures (e.g., Tan et al 2016;Gary et al 2018;Chen et al 2020;Zhu et al 2022). For example, Fleishman et al (2020) observed obvious decay of the magnetic field strength during a flare, indicating that the eruption is triggered by magnetic reconnection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Anfinogentov et al (2019) reported that the magnetic field strength at the base of the corona in an active region could reach 4000 Gauss. Radio observations have also been applied to magnetic field measurements in flaring structures (e.g., Tan et al 2016;Gary et al 2018;Chen et al 2020;Zhu et al 2022). For example, Fleishman et al (2020) observed obvious decay of the magnetic field strength during a flare, indicating that the eruption is triggered by magnetic reconnection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach to determine the coronal magnetic field structures is by using magnetic field extrapolation from photospheric magnetograms taken from observations in an active region (e.g., Sun et al 2012;Aschwanden 2013;Wang et al 2015a;Chifu et al 2017;Zhu & Wiegelmann 2018;Wiegelmann & Sakurai 2021;Zhu et al 2022) or the whole corona (e.g., Schatten et al 1969;Aly 1984;Tadesse et al 2014). In addition, the combination of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) or infrared observations and magnetic-field models (e.g., Liu & Lin 2008;Liu 2009;Li et al 2017;Chen et al 2018;Zhang et al 2022) or magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models (e.g., Dove et al 2011;Rachmeler et al 2013;Gibson et al 2016;Zhao et al 2021Zhao et al , 2019Jiang et al 2022) can also aid in the understanding of the magnetic field structures in the corona.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach is to construct coronal magnetic field models through extrapolations from magnetic field maps in the photosphere (e.g., Schatten et al 1969;Zhu & Wiegelmann 2018;Wiegelmann & Sakurai 2021;Zhu et al 2022). The combination of magnetic field or magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models and coronal observations in extreme ultraviolet (EUV) or infrared passbands can also be used to infer the magnetic field structures in the corona (e.g., Liu & Lin 2008;Liu 2009;Dove et al 2011;Gibson et al 2016;Chen et al 2018;Zhao et al 2019Zhao et al , 2021Zhang et al 2022;Jiang et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous attempts only measured the stellar photospheric magnetic field based on the Zeeman effect of spectral lines (e.g., Johns-Krull & Valenti 2000;Donati et al 2008;Morin et al 2008;Reiners 2012;Kochukhov & Lavail 2017;Kochukhov & Shulyak 2019). Compared with the photospheric magnetic field, the coronal magnetic field is even more difficult to measure, which is the case for both the Sun and other stars (e.g., Yang et al 2020aYang et al , 2020bJiang et al 2022;Zhu et al 2022). There have been several attempts to make stellar coronal magnetic field measurements based on radio observations (e.g., Gary & Linsky 1981;Mutel et al 1985;Güdel 2002), which could be subject to uncertainties because the radio emission mechanisms are often not easy to determine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%