The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/wptc51349.2021.9458201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetoelectric Versus Inductive Power Delivery for Sub-mm Receivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the ultra-small receiver (Rx) coil, there are three known methods of connecting it to the CMOS ASIC [ 9 ]: around CMOS (wire wound around the CMOS chip), in CMOS (fully integrated coils), and above CMOS (on top of CMOS substrate). The in-CMOS coil offers cost effectiveness, smaller volume, and ease of mass production but suffers from poor PTE (primarily due to substrate leakage) [ 10 ]. The around-CMOS coil offers a very high-quality factor (Q) but has variability in its electrical properties, making it challenging to resonate at a specific frequency [ 2 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the ultra-small receiver (Rx) coil, there are three known methods of connecting it to the CMOS ASIC [ 9 ]: around CMOS (wire wound around the CMOS chip), in CMOS (fully integrated coils), and above CMOS (on top of CMOS substrate). The in-CMOS coil offers cost effectiveness, smaller volume, and ease of mass production but suffers from poor PTE (primarily due to substrate leakage) [ 10 ]. The around-CMOS coil offers a very high-quality factor (Q) but has variability in its electrical properties, making it challenging to resonate at a specific frequency [ 2 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need of aggressive miniaturization of antennas and circuits limits the wireless power transfer for energy harvesting within implants. References [ 59 ] and [ 60 ] have shown that low gigahertz frequencies are well-suited for wireless power transfer to millimeter-sized implantable devices. Reference [ 61 ] presented a mm-size neural implant utilizing magnetoelectric effects for highly efficient power and data transfer, and [ 62 ] exhibits a wireless millimetric magnetoelectric implant to receive power and data for peripheral nerve stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetoelectric (ME) receivers are a promising solution for powering implantable bioelectronics because, compared to other WPT modalities, they have the potential to deliver higher power to smaller devices with better alignment tolerance and minimal signal attenuation through air or tissue 19 . While ME materials have been explored for compact antennas 22,23 , only recently have ME materials been used for WPT in bioelectronics, demonstrating up to 2 mW of power delivery 15,[24][25][26][27][28] . The ME receivers most commonly used to power bioelectronics are multilayer laminates that convert magnetic energy into electrical energy through mechanical coupling between magnetostrictive and piezoelectric layers 15,[24][25][26][27][28] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While ME materials have been explored for compact antennas 22,23 , only recently have ME materials been used for WPT in bioelectronics, demonstrating up to 2 mW of power delivery 15,[24][25][26][27][28] . The ME receivers most commonly used to power bioelectronics are multilayer laminates that convert magnetic energy into electrical energy through mechanical coupling between magnetostrictive and piezoelectric layers 15,[24][25][26][27][28] . This conversion is most efficient when the frequency of the magnetic field matches an acoustic resonant frequency of the ME receiver, thereby generating the maximum voltage and power [26][27][28][29] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%