2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(01)00835-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetoelastic stresses in epitaxial (110) Terfenol-D thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also see that the deformations within the (110) plane (y zplane in figure 1) are different, zz = yy , unlike the XRD results at zero-field, which indicate that they are isotropic, zz = yy . The shear deformations within the (110) plane, yz , cannot be compared with the XRD results; however, they are small, except at 140 K. The reason for the differences found between our values for the strains, obtained under a magnetic field, and the XRD zero-field values can be ascribed to the magnetostriction, which is large due to the strong magnetoelastic coupling in this system [7]. For instance, at 2 T the magnetization ea at 140 K is [111], and the large magnetostriction must be the origin of the large shear strain, yz , obtained at this temperature; as to the non-shear strains, at 40 K, where the magnetization ea is [001] and the magnetostriction is larger, we obtain a high value for the zz strain; whereas at RT the magnetization ea is [110], because at this temperature the magnetostriction is small [7], and the strain yy is not very different from the zero-field value.…”
contrasting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We also see that the deformations within the (110) plane (y zplane in figure 1) are different, zz = yy , unlike the XRD results at zero-field, which indicate that they are isotropic, zz = yy . The shear deformations within the (110) plane, yz , cannot be compared with the XRD results; however, they are small, except at 140 K. The reason for the differences found between our values for the strains, obtained under a magnetic field, and the XRD zero-field values can be ascribed to the magnetostriction, which is large due to the strong magnetoelastic coupling in this system [7]. For instance, at 2 T the magnetization ea at 140 K is [111], and the large magnetostriction must be the origin of the large shear strain, yz , obtained at this temperature; as to the non-shear strains, at 40 K, where the magnetization ea is [001] and the magnetostriction is larger, we obtain a high value for the zz strain; whereas at RT the magnetization ea is [110], because at this temperature the magnetostriction is small [7], and the strain yy is not very different from the zero-field value.…”
contrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In this situation, it is a customary procedure to extrapolate the anisotropy constants to infinite field linearly, especially when the anisotropy fields at different temperatures are of the same order or smaller than the applied fields. In our case, magnetization hysteresis loops indicate that the anisotropy fields are below 1.5 T [7]. Therefore, we have proceeded with such an extrapolation to get the true anisotropy constants (see figure 4, for the RT case).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this work we study Terfenol-D at room temperature. For the elastic constants we set the values given by Clark [10,14] [16], so that we set the isotropic magnetostrictive coefficient to zero (λ α = 0). The magnetocrystalline anisotropy constants vary significantly, depending on temperature and stoichiometry [2,14,16,17].…”
Section: Properties Of Terfenol-d 221 Bulkmentioning
confidence: 99%