Magneto-Structural Correlations in Exchange Coupled Systems 1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-6511-9_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magneto-Structural Correlations in Bioinorganic Chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In compound 6 , the distorted square pyramidal geometry of the Cu II ions results in a ground state configuration of the complex dominated by d x 2- y 2 orbitals that orient their lobes toward both the alkoxo and pyrazolate bridging ligands. As noted by others, 1a,b strong antiferromagnetic exchange coupling is anticipated for dinuclear complexes containing d x 2- y 2 magnetic orbitals and in compounds where the energy differences between the symmetric (d s ‘‘) and antisymmetric (d a ‘‘) combinations of magnetic orbitals are large. 1a, In this case, the S = 0 state is lower in energy than the S = 1 state, and the singlet−triplet (S−T) splitting is reflected in the magnitude of the exchange parameter J . [Cu 2 (L−Et)N 3 ] 2+ is an example of a strong antiferromagnetically coupled complex that is essentially diamagnetic at room temperature ( J > −500 cm -1 ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In compound 6 , the distorted square pyramidal geometry of the Cu II ions results in a ground state configuration of the complex dominated by d x 2- y 2 orbitals that orient their lobes toward both the alkoxo and pyrazolate bridging ligands. As noted by others, 1a,b strong antiferromagnetic exchange coupling is anticipated for dinuclear complexes containing d x 2- y 2 magnetic orbitals and in compounds where the energy differences between the symmetric (d s ‘‘) and antisymmetric (d a ‘‘) combinations of magnetic orbitals are large. 1a, In this case, the S = 0 state is lower in energy than the S = 1 state, and the singlet−triplet (S−T) splitting is reflected in the magnitude of the exchange parameter J . [Cu 2 (L−Et)N 3 ] 2+ is an example of a strong antiferromagnetically coupled complex that is essentially diamagnetic at room temperature ( J > −500 cm -1 ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The different magnetic properties of the pyrazolate- and acetate-bridged complexes may be rationalized as resulting from differences in the coordination geometries around the Cu II ions as well as different metal−ligand magnetic orbital interactions associated with both complexes. Using the active electron approximation model, only the magnetic orbitals of the metal and the HOMO's of the bridging ligands were used to rationalize the origin of the magnetic exchange interaction 1d. In the absence of a second bridging ligand (acetate or pyrazolate), μ-alkoxo-bridged dinuclear copper complexes are antiferromagnetically coupled ( J = −316 cm -1 ) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They also show some intense absorptions above 25,000 cm-1. 24 So far in our discussion we have only considered excitations that are spin forbidden in the single ion. The participation of excitations that are spin allowed in the single ion is not nearly as well understood.…”
Section: Double Excitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%