Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0383-1_116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magneto-Optic Image Classification Using Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to a classical Eddy-Current method, the gain of time is about 8. Nevertheless, interpretation requires qualified people even when a lot of methods are proposed for helping the detection of flaws by a complementary image processing and for improving the MOI® capabilities in order to detect corrosion or cracks close to fasteners [2,3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to a classical Eddy-Current method, the gain of time is about 8. Nevertheless, interpretation requires qualified people even when a lot of methods are proposed for helping the detection of flaws by a complementary image processing and for improving the MOI® capabilities in order to detect corrosion or cracks close to fasteners [2,3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preprocessed data are then combined in the data fusion module using an appropriate strategy [15,16,18,[30][31][32]. The fused data can be analyzed and evaluated further to extract relevant information using appropriate classification and characterization algorithms [33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Data Fusion In Ndementioning
confidence: 99%