2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.89.104421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization switching through spin-Hall-effect-induced chiral domain wall propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

11
84
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
11
84
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2b, consistently with previous reports of SOT-induced switching of perpendicularly magnetized layers 1,9,10,[12][13][14]17 . Further, we find that the switching speed increases by increasing the current amplitude, allowing for full magnetization reversal within a sub-ns current pulse (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2b, consistently with previous reports of SOT-induced switching of perpendicularly magnetized layers 1,9,10,[12][13][14]17 . Further, we find that the switching speed increases by increasing the current amplitude, allowing for full magnetization reversal within a sub-ns current pulse (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, these experiments only measured the switching probability as a function of pulse amplitude and duration, while the mechanism and the timescale of magnetization reversal remain unknown. Microscopy studies performed using the magneto-optic Kerr effect have extensively probed SOT-induced DW displacements [14][15][16][17][18][19]28 , revealing the role played by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) in stabilizing chiral DW structures that have very high mobility 17,18,[29][30][31][32][33] . Such investigations have a spatial resolution of the order of 1 µm, but only probed the static magnetization after current injection, similar to the pulsed switching experiments 1,26,27 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the SOT responsible for switching stems from the Pt layer rather than IrMn because of its much higher current density. Assuming that the dampinglike torque is a result of the spin Hall effect solely, we can find the spin Hall angle using θ SHE ¼ ð−2jejM s t F =hÞ × ðΔH L =JÞ, where jej, h, t F , and M s represent the absolute value of the electron's charge, Planck's constant, ferromagnetic layer thickness, and the saturation magnetization of the ferromagnetic layer [31]. Using a superconducting quantum-interference-device measurement, the saturation magnetization is found to be 1100 emu=cm 3 .…”
Section: Current-driven Magnetization Switching With Out-of-planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the contributions of various interfacial effects, such as the Rashba effects, spin Hall effects (SHEs), and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) to the SOT switching also remain elusive. One widely accepted SOT switching mechanism is based on the macrospin model [4], in which the SOT nucleates initial domains through the macrospin model and switches the entire ferromagnet by subsequent domain expansion [4,12,[23][24][25]. In this model, SHEs dominate the SOT switching, which obeys the rule shown in Figs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%