Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.014430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization switching by current and microwaves

Abstract: We propose a theoretical model of magnetization switching in a ferromagnetic multilayer by both electric current and microwaves. The electric current gives a spin transfer torque on the magnetization, while the microwaves induce a precession of the magnetization around the initial state. Based on numerical simulation of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation, it is found that the switching current is significantly reduced compared with the switching caused solely by the spin transfer torque when the microw… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(172 reference statements)
3
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of the self-oscillation indicates that the threshold current density is larger than the current necessary to stabilize the self-oscillation. This dynamics is consistent with our previous work 16 .…”
Section: Pacs Numberssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of the self-oscillation indicates that the threshold current density is larger than the current necessary to stabilize the self-oscillation. This dynamics is consistent with our previous work 16 .…”
Section: Pacs Numberssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Positive current corresponds to electron flow from the free to the pinned layer. The values of the parameters Note that the parameter λ has often been assumed to be zero in previous works [9][10][11]13,17 , including our recent work 16 , for simplicity. However, this parameter plays a key role, as described in the following discussion.…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation and analytical analysis To understand these behaviors of the magnetization and find a way to obtain OPP stable oscillation in the general case of LFM  tFM, we analytically solve the time evolution of the energy of the magnetization [19,20]. In the following derivation, we consider the case of x N < z N (tFM < LFM) without the loss of generality.…”
Section: Device Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because p = k and β = 1 are held on the saddle energy curve, the integration of Eq. (19), (20) and (21)…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31], the critical and switching current densities are defined as j c = lim E→Emin j(E) and j sw = max[j(E)], respectively, which are not necessarily same. The analytical solution of j(E) for an arbitrary E is complex.…”
Section: Llg Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%