2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.103.127202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization Reversal of Nanoscale Islands: How Size and Shape Affect the Arrhenius Prefactor

Abstract: The thermal switching behavior of individual in-plane magnetized Fe/W(110) nanoislands is investigated by a combined study of variable-temperature spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy and Monte Carlo simulations. Even for islands consisting of less than 100 atoms the magnetization reversal takes place via nucleation and propagation. The Arrhenius prefactor is found to strongly depend on the individual island size and shape, and based on the experimental results a simple model is developed to describe t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
96
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher range of values was found where the remagnetization occurs via formation of a temporary domain wall ('soliton' mechanism [2]). Experimental estimates for islands falling within a more limited range in shape and size are in close agreement with the calculated values [16]. An HTST estimate for larger permalloy islands used in kagome spin ice systems [17] gave a smaller value, 9.9×10 8 sec −1 [18] while analysis of the experimental data had assumed a value of 10 12 sec −1 [17].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The higher range of values was found where the remagnetization occurs via formation of a temporary domain wall ('soliton' mechanism [2]). Experimental estimates for islands falling within a more limited range in shape and size are in close agreement with the calculated values [16]. An HTST estimate for larger permalloy islands used in kagome spin ice systems [17] gave a smaller value, 9.9×10 8 sec −1 [18] while analysis of the experimental data had assumed a value of 10 12 sec −1 [17].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This supports the view that the formation of the SH in Fe-b is driven by a subtle interplay of the exchange interaction acting differently at different spinspin distances. Thermal energy 32 or zero point energy 33 may drive the fluctuation of the phase of the SH, which results in an averaged-out magnetic signal in SP-STM/S at 0 T.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general theory was applied by Néel [2] and subsequently by Brown [21] to small ferromagnetic single-domain grains/nanoparticles. During the last decades these theoretical findings were endorsed by experiments performed at low temperatures in the presence of static magnetic fields [17], ac-magnetic fields [22,23] or spin-polarized currents [24,25]. In the present study we focus on the composite multiferroic structure, depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%