1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(96)00744-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization reversal in ultrathin ferromagnetic films with perpendicular anisotropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
45
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
10
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, mainly three ways of estimating the value of the critical field H c from V (H ) curves were used: (i) a linear extrapolation to zero velocity, V ∝ (H − H c ), from data around depinning, 1 (ii) when choosing a critical velocity V c , one can determine at low temperatures the critical field from V (H c ) = V c , 44,45 and (iii) the end of the creep regime from below as a lower bound for H c . 4 The first two protocols are useful when one has velocity-field curves over a limited field range.…”
Section: Experimental Estimates For H C and ψmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, mainly three ways of estimating the value of the critical field H c from V (H ) curves were used: (i) a linear extrapolation to zero velocity, V ∝ (H − H c ), from data around depinning, 1 (ii) when choosing a critical velocity V c , one can determine at low temperatures the critical field from V (H c ) = V c , 44,45 and (iii) the end of the creep regime from below as a lower bound for H c . 4 The first two protocols are useful when one has velocity-field curves over a limited field range.…”
Section: Experimental Estimates For H C and ψmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that these are 0 K simulations so, as would be expected, the nucleation and propagation fields are much higher than in room temperature experiments. 17 However, there is a clear qualitative agreement between the simulation and experiment. Firstly, reducing the anisotropy leads to a reduction in the nucleation field until the magnetization lies in plane.…”
Section: Domain Wall Nucleation and Injectionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…, where t 0 , V A , and k B T are characteristic switching time when H¼H C , activation volume and thermal energy, respectively [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. In the case of backward branch reversal, the DWs are frequently pinned during reversal process as mentioned before, implying that the reversal mechanism is DW creep motion [26,[30][31][32][33] at all t IrMn .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%