1964
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.31.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization Process of a Screw Spin System. II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the above theory the transition field is expected to be of the order of (J (0) − J (q))/M (ref. 29), in agreement with the observed fields (M is the magnetic moment). For PrPtAl the energy dispersion of the lowest crystal field excitation gives an energy difference E(0) − E(q 1,2 ) ≈ 0.2 meV (Supplementary Information), which corresponds to a field in excess of 2 T. We find a much lower field is needed to suppress the modulated state, as described below.…”
Section: Nature Physics Doi: 101038/nphys3238supporting
confidence: 90%
“…For the above theory the transition field is expected to be of the order of (J (0) − J (q))/M (ref. 29), in agreement with the observed fields (M is the magnetic moment). For PrPtAl the energy dispersion of the lowest crystal field excitation gives an energy difference E(0) − E(q 1,2 ) ≈ 0.2 meV (Supplementary Information), which corresponds to a field in excess of 2 T. We find a much lower field is needed to suppress the modulated state, as described below.…”
Section: Nature Physics Doi: 101038/nphys3238supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The modification of the spin screw structure due to the anisotropy energy and the applied magnetic field could be unambiguously interpreted with the theory of Kitano and Nagamiya [4].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Though below T N the a-axis susceptibility decreases faster than the one along the c axis, they both change in a similar fashion and in disparity with the relatively small decrease in the b-axis susceptibility. The observed finite values of the susceptibility along all crystallographic directions at low temperature differ qualitatively from those of the simple collinear antiferromagnet (where parallel susceptibility vanishes at low temperature) and are somewhat reminiscence of the susceptibility behavior in screw-type magnetic structures, 24 where both parallel and perpendicular components remain finite.…”
Section: A Bulk Magnetic Responsementioning
confidence: 71%