2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.63.014402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization jump in theXXZchain with next-nearest-neighbor exchange

Abstract: We study the dependence of the magnetization M with magnetic field B at zero temperature in the spin-1/2 XXZ chain with nearest-neighbor (NN) J1 and next-NN J2 exchange interactions, with anisotropies ∆1 and ∆2 respectively. The region of parameters for which a jump in M (B) exists is studied using numerical diagonalization, and analytical results for two magnons on a ferromagnetic background in the thermodynamic limit. We find a line in the parameter space (J2/J1, ∆1/J1, ∆2/J1) (determined by two simple equat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3) that q min is indeed the beginning of an instability that leads to a macroscopic discontinuity in the magnetization. This is consistent with previous work, 17,22 where bound states of such magnons have been found to be the cause of metamagnetism in spin chains, though previously the attractive interactions were directly related to geometric frustration (which is not present in the J-Q chain; the Q term competes in a different way against AFM order).…”
Section: A Origin Of the Magnetization Jumpsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3) that q min is indeed the beginning of an instability that leads to a macroscopic discontinuity in the magnetization. This is consistent with previous work, 17,22 where bound states of such magnons have been found to be the cause of metamagnetism in spin chains, though previously the attractive interactions were directly related to geometric frustration (which is not present in the J-Q chain; the Q term competes in a different way against AFM order).…”
Section: A Origin Of the Magnetization Jumpsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…(11) becomes the simplest example of a frustrated spin model; this case has been well studied. [17][18][19][22][23][24][28][29][30][47][48][49] Several papers have presented evidence of metamagnetism in the J 1 -J 2 chain in this regime for both the isotropic 18,21-24 and anisotropic 17,19,20,24 cases. Naively, a FM secondneighbor term is trivial since it does not produce frustration; with an AFM first-neighbor coupling it would serve to strengthen the AFM order.…”
Section: Metamagnetism In the J1-j2 Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At every size we find the same behavior: roughly linear response until m ≈ 1/6 followed by a sharp jump to the fully polarized state. This resembles the so-called metamagnetic transition demonstrated in the anisotropic J 1 -J 2 chain [11][12][13][14]. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…One is the magnetization plateau, which usually accompanies with the spin excitation gap and has been found in many systems, such as the frustrated spin systems [3,4], and quasi-periodic systems with nontrivial topological property [5,6]. The other is the magnetization jump, which exhibits discontinuity in the magnetization density.The magnetization jump was first proposed by Néel [7] in the system with the Ising-like anisotropic exchange interaction, and then also investigated in various of lattice spin systems in different dimensions [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Most of these model systems involve anisotropy or frustration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%