2002
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2002.8472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization Evolution in Network Models of Porous Rock under Conditions of Drainage and Imbibition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b Apparent pore-to-throat size aspect ratio for Berea sandstone sample 31% water saturation, however, these authors observed the disappearance of the secondary peak at small pore sizes and were able to determine pores as small as 0.3 µm. This behavior is predicted by pore network simulations of NMR magnetization decay (Chang and Ioannidis 2002), under conditions of diffusion coupling between micropores and macropores.…”
Section: Pore Size Distributions and Apparent Pore-to-throat Aspect Rmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…b Apparent pore-to-throat size aspect ratio for Berea sandstone sample 31% water saturation, however, these authors observed the disappearance of the secondary peak at small pore sizes and were able to determine pores as small as 0.3 µm. This behavior is predicted by pore network simulations of NMR magnetization decay (Chang and Ioannidis 2002), under conditions of diffusion coupling between micropores and macropores.…”
Section: Pore Size Distributions and Apparent Pore-to-throat Aspect Rmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In fact, a considerable fraction of the pore volume exhibits Euclidean features and is adequately described by models of grain packing and compaction (Bakke and Oren 1997;Thovert et al 2001) or by 3D stochastic reconstruction from limited 2D morphological information (Adler et al 1990;Liang et al 2000;Talukdar et al 2002). To fully understand the capillary properties of sedimentary rock, it is necessary to quantify the entire spectrum of pore length scales actually present (Tsakiroglou and Payatakes 1993;Chang and Ioannidis 2002). For example, failure to model the electrical resistivity and wetting-phase relative permeability at low values of water saturation has been attributed to inadequate resolution of pore geometry over sub-micrometric length scales (Bekri et al 2003;Han et al 2009), that are well within the size range where fractal scaling laws apply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore network model developed here for GDLs is based on the one described by Ioannidis and Chatzis [17] and Chang and Ioannidis [20]. The pores are 8 modeled as nodes on a regular cubic lattice, interconnected with throats.…”
Section: Pore and Throat Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unresolved length scales due to the presence of cracks, corners, crevices and interstitial regions at fiber-fiber contact points amount to pore space from which the wetting phase is displaced at capillary pressures higher than corresponding to first entry of the non-wetting phase into any pore in the network. To account for the gradual drainage of the wetting phase from such small scale features, we employ the following expression [20]:…”
Section: Late Pore Fillingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other dynamical aspects (behaviour of residual gas pockets related to saturation, prewetting layers, Bosanquet-flow -see Section IV) can also be added [25,32,49,52,63,238,279,281,298]. Simulations can be either quasi-staticthe dynamics is applied at the "weakest link", and no other processes are allowed -or dynamic so that the pressure balance is maintained dynamically at the single pore level [29,30,51,65,74,136,157,238].…”
Section: F Microscopic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%