1963
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.129.528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization and Critical Supercurrents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
186
1
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 795 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
8
186
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetization process is usually described in terms of the Bean model [29] and its generalizations: flux lines enter into the sample and, due to the presence of quenched disorder, give rise to a steady flux gradient. While the Bean model provides a consistent picture of average magnetization properties, such as the hysteresis loop and thermal relaxation effects [30], it does not account for local fluctuations in time and space. It has been recently observed that flux line dynamics is intermittent, taking place in avalanches [31], and flux fronts are not smooth [32][33][34].…”
Section: Gradient Driven Dynamics: Front Invasionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetization process is usually described in terms of the Bean model [29] and its generalizations: flux lines enter into the sample and, due to the presence of quenched disorder, give rise to a steady flux gradient. While the Bean model provides a consistent picture of average magnetization properties, such as the hysteresis loop and thermal relaxation effects [30], it does not account for local fluctuations in time and space. It has been recently observed that flux line dynamics is intermittent, taking place in avalanches [31], and flux fronts are not smooth [32][33][34].…”
Section: Gradient Driven Dynamics: Front Invasionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magneto-Optical Imaging (MOI) is generally carried out under static field conditions with a constant applied DC field [2,[12][13][14][15][16]. MOI investigations into vortex dynamics or other "dynamic" effects in superconductors typically deal with AC fields [17,18], or simply consider the effect of changing the magnetic sweep rate on the final stable state [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact and the strong dependence of J c ðBÞ produce an asymmetric M(H) loop with higher magnetization values in the lower branch. As has been suggested in the earlier work of Kim,20 the average magnetic field in the upper and lower branches can be estimated by hBi ' l 0 H 6 MðHÞ=2 and a quasisymmetric loop MðhBiÞ can be obtained. For fields l 0 H $ 1T and higher, where the creep studies are performed, the difference between hBi and l 0 H in all the samples becomes negligible; therefore, the relaxation study and sample comparison can be done at fixed H.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%