Earthquake Prediction and Rock Mechanics 1975
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-5534-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetism of Rocks and Volumetric Strain in Uniaxial Failure Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A memory effect in remnant magnetisation was observed [95]. Cyclic uniaxial compression tests were performed on gabbro specimens whereby the intensity of remnant magnetisation was measured in the direction parallel to the loading axis.…”
Section: Stress (Strain) Memory Effects In Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A memory effect in remnant magnetisation was observed [95]. Cyclic uniaxial compression tests were performed on gabbro specimens whereby the intensity of remnant magnetisation was measured in the direction parallel to the loading axis.…”
Section: Stress (Strain) Memory Effects In Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetisation is measured in the direction parallel to the loading axis; based on Ref. [95] performed on coal specimens, permeability being measured along the r 1 -axis [96]. Loading was either hydrostatic or triaxial proportional, i.e.…”
Section: Intensity Of Magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much experimental work has been carried out on the stress sensitivities of both the magnetic susceptibility and remanent magnetization [Nagata, 1970a, b;Martin and Wyss, 1975;Wyss and Martin, 1977]. The general result is that rocks change their magnetization as a function of stress.…”
Section: Piezomagnetismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility that observable magnetic field variations are associated with tectonic stress accumulation presents a possible means of predicting earthquakes by monitoring magnetic field changes. This intriguing idea is supported by laboratory observations of changes in magnetic properties of rock in response to stress changes [Kalashnikov, 1954;Kapitsa, 1955;Ohnaka and Kinoshita, 1968;Martin and Wyss, 1975;Martin et al, 1978]. Assuming stress induced susceptibility or remanence changes, theoretical calculations indicate that magnetic field changes as large as a few gammas (nT) are expected to be associated with tectonic stress changes [Shamsi and Stacey, 1969;Talwani and Kovach, 1972].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%