2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.1156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetisation distribution in magnetic bilayers with rough surfaces and interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 magnetisation versus y is plotted for different q parameters. On can see that increase of coupling strength in stronger coupled layer leads to decrease of parameter B in agreement with our earlier results concerning magnetisation behavior in non-equivalent layers [13]. We have also studied the influence of anisotropy in the interface region on spin wave parameter in the system under consideration.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 magnetisation versus y is plotted for different q parameters. On can see that increase of coupling strength in stronger coupled layer leads to decrease of parameter B in agreement with our earlier results concerning magnetisation behavior in non-equivalent layers [13]. We have also studied the influence of anisotropy in the interface region on spin wave parameter in the system under consideration.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…3 Numerical results It has been shown [13] that properties of the system of two non-equivalent layers are strongly dependent on relative exchange parameter q and on thicknesses of constituent layers. In this paper we perform further investigations of influence of those parameters on magnetisation behavior.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One common approach is to study M and SW parameter (B) of FM thin layers. The observed results show that Curie temperature and B oscillate with ST [5,6], which is investigated theoretically [7,8]. A SW theory has been used to explain the ST-dependence of M and B.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%