2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4943417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetically launched flyer plate technique for probing electrical conductivity of compressed copper

Abstract: The electrical conductivity of materials under extremes of temperature and pressure is of crucial importance for a wide variety of phenomena, including planetary modeling, inertial confinement fusion, and pulsed power based dynamic materials experiments. There is a dearth of experimental techniques and data for highly compressed materials, even at known states such as along the principal isentrope and Hugoniot, where many pulsed power experiments occur. We present a method for developing, calibrating, and vali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both simulations used the Kerley03 28 EOS for hydrogen (a modern revision of the lation with the same magnitude first shock followed by ramp compression to the same peak P (method 2). In these simulations EOS models 3325, 29,30 3700, 31,32 and 7411 33 were used to model copper, aluminum, and sapphire, respectively. As can be seen in the figure, T in the peak state for these two simulations differs by over 500 K. This is completely explained by the difference in entropy of the final states for the two different methods used by NWM.…”
Section: Reanalysis Of Multiple-shock Conductivity Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both simulations used the Kerley03 28 EOS for hydrogen (a modern revision of the lation with the same magnitude first shock followed by ramp compression to the same peak P (method 2). In these simulations EOS models 3325, 29,30 3700, 31,32 and 7411 33 were used to model copper, aluminum, and sapphire, respectively. As can be seen in the figure, T in the peak state for these two simulations differs by over 500 K. This is completely explained by the difference in entropy of the final states for the two different methods used by NWM.…”
Section: Reanalysis Of Multiple-shock Conductivity Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cold pressure curves are plotted in figures 3 and 4 for Al and Cu, respectively, along with data assembled from the literature [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Each curve is the 'repulsive' pressure, calculated from the TFDW model (equation ( 24)), minus the 'attractive' pressure (equation ( 35)).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the most accurate data for electrical conductivity for Cu have been produced at Sandia National Laboratory using two approaches: DFT and Lee-More-Desjarlais model [40]. The data from the latter were fine-tuned using experimental data on the Thor pulsed-power driver [41,42]. These data are also presented in figure 5 for comparison.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of Cu Using the Average Atom Model Collis...mentioning
confidence: 99%