2012
DOI: 10.1021/nl300141k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetically Guided Nano–Micro Shaping and Slicing of Silicon

Abstract: Silicon is one of the most important materials for modern electronics, telecom, and photovoltaic (PV) solar cells. With the rapidly expanding use of Si in the global economy, it would be highly desirable to reduce the overall use of Si material, especially to make the PVs more affordable and widely used as a renewable energy source. Here we report the first successful direction-guided, nano/microshaping of silicon, the intended direction of which is dictated by an applied magnetic field. Micrometer thin, massi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, thin-fi lm based MACE still relies on 2D templating techniques to pattern the catalyst-such as photolithography, [ 33 ] e-beam lithography, [ 22 ] interference lithography, [ 35 ] thin-fi lm dewetting, [ 25 ] nanosphere lithography, [ 36 ] and block-copolymer lithography. While there has been reported success in the control the catalyst etch direction to achieve 3D features via magnetic-assisted MACE [ 38,39 ] and engineering the catalyst motion, [ 22,[40][41][42] these approaches have limited control over the span of 3D features it can produce and have not been demonstrated to have high repeatability. This characteristic adds to the processing complexity, generates waste, and makes MACE's cost and scalability a function of other processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, thin-fi lm based MACE still relies on 2D templating techniques to pattern the catalyst-such as photolithography, [ 33 ] e-beam lithography, [ 22 ] interference lithography, [ 35 ] thin-fi lm dewetting, [ 25 ] nanosphere lithography, [ 36 ] and block-copolymer lithography. While there has been reported success in the control the catalyst etch direction to achieve 3D features via magnetic-assisted MACE [ 38,39 ] and engineering the catalyst motion, [ 22,[40][41][42] these approaches have limited control over the span of 3D features it can produce and have not been demonstrated to have high repeatability. This characteristic adds to the processing complexity, generates waste, and makes MACE's cost and scalability a function of other processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34] For bias-free watersplitting PEC cells, any combination of n-and p-type semiconductors can be utilized as a photoanode (e.g., Fe 2 O 3 , [35,36] BiVO 4 , [37,38] WO 3 , [39][40][41] etc.) and a photocathode (e.g., Si, [42,43] Cu 2 O, [44,45] CuBi 2 O 4 , [46,47] etc. ), respectively, if a combined band gap is larger than 1.23 eV and the VB edge of a photoanode and the CB edge of a photocathode straddle the redox poten- tials for OER and HER.…”
Section: Types Of Artificial Photosynthetic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, charge carriers are injected into Si and charge distribution affects the catalyst movement [21], so that parallel and elongated structures [16] are more difficult to etch than spaced cavities [22]. Electron-hole concentration balancing structures were used to achieve a vertical etch profile [16], negative carbon mask [23,24], electrical bias [24,25], magnetic catalyst [26] to improve the control of the catalyst movement [27][28][29]. The holes diffuse from the Si under the metal to either the off-metal areas or to the walls of the pore if the rate of the holes consumption at the Au-Si interface is smaller than the rate of holes injection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%