2013 12th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering 2013
DOI: 10.1109/eeeic.2013.6549539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetically coupled wireless communication for buried environmental sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously discussed that the heterogeneous soil medium and water content of the soil limit the transmission range of EMbased IoUT [40]. Hence, magnetic induction (MI) has been introduced to overcome the limitations of EM waves for IoUT [21], [98]. In this section, we will cover multiple aspects of MI-based IoUT which include channel modeling, networking, and localization.…”
Section: Magnetic Induction For Ioutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously discussed that the heterogeneous soil medium and water content of the soil limit the transmission range of EMbased IoUT [40]. Hence, magnetic induction (MI) has been introduced to overcome the limitations of EM waves for IoUT [21], [98]. In this section, we will cover multiple aspects of MI-based IoUT which include channel modeling, networking, and localization.…”
Section: Magnetic Induction For Ioutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another wireless sensor mote using LF (125 kHz) magnetic induction from a buried battery-powered transmitter is presented in [16]. With the help of a large coil antenna measuring 4 m by 4 m on the surface, a ground-penetration communication range of 12 m is achieved through buried black schist ore.…”
Section: Wireless/rfids For Pipelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The communication protocols and system schematics are designed to reduce the detuning effects of metal seen by conventional RFID platforms. Our solution combines the higher range of currently available methods from 3 m and RYB, with the sensor abilities of [15][16][17] while remaining passive (battery-less). A comparison to other research is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Overview Of Proposed Designmentioning
confidence: 99%