1983
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.27.6960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic susceptibilities and energy levels in Er(OH)3

Abstract: Measurements of the magnetic susceptibilities and their anisotropies of single crystals of Er(OH)& in the temperature range of 300 -70 K are reported here for the first time. Using these results, crystal-field analysis was made to obtain the crystal-field levels of the ground and excited terms, which explained the observed optical spectra. The g values were found to be g[[=1. 69+0.01 and g&=8.84+0.02. The nuclear hyperfine splitting was also calculated and the hyperfine constants A and B, the internal magnetic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1984
1984
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the wavefunctions of CF levels of table 1, we calculated the g-values of ErDG. These values are g = 10.314 and g ⊥ = 0.0, which are very different from those reported for other Er 3+ compounds [42][43][44] because in this case the M j value of the principal component of the lowest level is 15/2, which is consistent with the optical result [14].…”
Section: Energycontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Using the wavefunctions of CF levels of table 1, we calculated the g-values of ErDG. These values are g = 10.314 and g ⊥ = 0.0, which are very different from those reported for other Er 3+ compounds [42][43][44] because in this case the M j value of the principal component of the lowest level is 15/2, which is consistent with the optical result [14].…”
Section: Energycontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…More practical winding distributions have been proposed for the design of deflection units for a variety of applications including electron microscopes, vidicons, etc. (6)(7)(8)(9). In these cases however, the radius of the region in which the field is to be used is much smaller than the radius of the cylinder on which the currents are distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%