2002
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.41.1331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Structures of an Iron–Gadolinium Multilayer at Low Temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. This curve is calculated for a structure with 17 in agreement with Fig. 2 where we have seen that neither the Gd-aligned nor the Fe-aligned state is stable in the high-field region of the phase diagram.…”
Section: Gd Layerssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…4. This curve is calculated for a structure with 17 in agreement with Fig. 2 where we have seen that neither the Gd-aligned nor the Fe-aligned state is stable in the high-field region of the phase diagram.…”
Section: Gd Layerssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This value is considerably smaller than the bulk saturation magnetization for Gd, 2056 emu/cm 3 , but it is similar to the reduced magnetization in thin-film Gd reported by other authors. 16,17 The saturation magnetization of a single Gd thin film was measured very close to the bulk value (see Fig. 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A 20-30% reduction of the magnetization of Gd in Gd/Fe multilayers has previously been reported by several groups, [13][14][15] but very rarely is the reduction as large as the one reported here. 16,17 Beyond the different values obtained for the enhanced exchange and the reduced magnetization of Gd, this work shows that a DSV is an efficient tool for characterizing magnetic materials in general and compounds of REs in particular, which is of great interest for many magnetic research fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10,11,12] We have studied the effect of reducing M We have also simulated a multilayer with a reduced interface coupling A int = −A Gd = −0.75 µerg cm −1 . The main features, relative to the "standard" simulation with A int = −1.0 µerg cm −1 , were strongly reduced α i and boundary angles but slightly higher DW widths for all fields.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%