2015
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/10/103007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic structure driven by monoclinic distortions in the double perovskite Sr2YRuO6

Abstract: The monoclinic double perovskite Sr 2 YRuO 6 has recently gained a renewed interest in order to get a deeper insight into the exotic magnetic ground states associated with geometric frustration. Striking discrepancies between the spin order derived from the neutron diffraction refinements and the macroscopic magnetic and thermal responses is a major challenge that must be addressed. In this work, detailed neutron diffraction measurements as a function of temperature yield a completely different interpretation … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that there appear neither appreciable changes in the magnetic peak profiles nor new magnetic Bragg peaks in the temperature dependent data across the second anomaly (~36.5 K). In particular we did not detect any additional superlattice peak in the temperature region between TN1 and TN2, such as the one created by a propagation vector k = (½, ½, 0) found by Bernardo et al [36] in Sr2YRuO6. Furthermore there is no indication for short range correlations in the background below TN1 = 40 K. This indicates that the second transition might be associated with very small changes in the spin structure/spin reorientation which are beyond the detection limit even of the high intensity data.…”
Section: (D) Neutron Powder Diffraction Studiessupporting
confidence: 39%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that there appear neither appreciable changes in the magnetic peak profiles nor new magnetic Bragg peaks in the temperature dependent data across the second anomaly (~36.5 K). In particular we did not detect any additional superlattice peak in the temperature region between TN1 and TN2, such as the one created by a propagation vector k = (½, ½, 0) found by Bernardo et al [36] in Sr2YRuO6. Furthermore there is no indication for short range correlations in the background below TN1 = 40 K. This indicates that the second transition might be associated with very small changes in the spin structure/spin reorientation which are beyond the detection limit even of the high intensity data.…”
Section: (D) Neutron Powder Diffraction Studiessupporting
confidence: 39%
“…Similar two anomalies/transitions were also reported for isostructural Sr2LnRuO6 (Ln=Y, Ho, Yb and Tb) and identified as antiferromagnetic ordering temperatures (TN2 and TN1). The anomalies were situated at 24 and 29 K for Y [36,37], 36 and 40 K for Yb [38], 32 and 26 K for Lu [46], and 15 and 36 K for Hobased systems [47]. On the other hand, the heat capacity study on the cubic Ba2DyRuO6 reveals only a single anomaly at 47 K [48], similar to La2NaRuO6 [11,41].…”
Section: (B) Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, above T N 1 , a magnetically correlated state is observed, with significant correlations up to ∼ 300 K [11,22]. A second magnetic structure has been recently reported to occur between T N 1 and T N 2 [23], however no evidence of this state was observed in our previous detailed high-resolution diffraction study. [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…911 However, when the structural distortion is significant, the fcc network can become asymmetric, and thus, the magnetic order can be reinstated. 12,13 Indeed, it has been observed in DPs with various A ions that the spin ordering is associated with the structural distortion, which is tunable due to different ionic sizes of the A site ions. 1…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%