2019
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci9080181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Source Imaging and Infant MEG: Current Trends and Technical Advances

Abstract: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is known for its temporal precision and good spatial resolution in cognitive brain research. Nonetheless, it is still rarely used in developmental research, and its role in developmental cognitive neuroscience is not adequately addressed. The current review focuses on the source analysis of MEG measurement and its potential to answer critical questions on neural activation origins and patterns underlying infants’ early cognitive experience. The advantages of MEG source localization… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(167 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Source estimation has not been frequently reported in the infant EEG literature, with the notable exception of a few research groups that used volumetric approaches such as CDR with realistic head models built from MRIs of head-size-matched individuals ( Xie and Richards, 2017 ) or from age-matched MRI averages ( Lunghi et al, 2019 ), or using ECD with a four-shell ellipsoidal head model ( Ortiz-Mantilla et al, 2019 ). Source imaging is more frequently used in magnetoencephalography (MEG) ( Kao and Zhang, 2019 ), but it generally relies on over simplistic spherical models to overcome the absence of realistic head models ( Imada et al, 2006 ; Kuhl et al, 2014 ) or it uses custom-built subject-specific head models that are not reusable by the research community ( Ramírez et al, 2017 ; Travis et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source estimation has not been frequently reported in the infant EEG literature, with the notable exception of a few research groups that used volumetric approaches such as CDR with realistic head models built from MRIs of head-size-matched individuals ( Xie and Richards, 2017 ) or from age-matched MRI averages ( Lunghi et al, 2019 ), or using ECD with a four-shell ellipsoidal head model ( Ortiz-Mantilla et al, 2019 ). Source imaging is more frequently used in magnetoencephalography (MEG) ( Kao and Zhang, 2019 ), but it generally relies on over simplistic spherical models to overcome the absence of realistic head models ( Imada et al, 2006 ; Kuhl et al, 2014 ) or it uses custom-built subject-specific head models that are not reusable by the research community ( Ramírez et al, 2017 ; Travis et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, neuroimaging has been widely used to study brain diseases [7][8][9]. Neuroimaging technology provides anatomical and functional images of the brain, such as Positron Emission Computed Tomography (PECT), Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (SMRI), Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DMRI), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI), Electroencephalogram (EEG), and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) [10][11][12]. Among them, SMRI is often used for the characterization and prediction of AD due to its relatively low cost and good imaging quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since neuroimage recording requires children to stay still for a long period of time in a noisy or closed environment, the requirements for children are exacting and difficult to meet [37]. FMRI studies on young children are usually conducted during natural sleep to conduct resting-state network-related studies; therefore, the ability to directly investigate brain function during tasks is limited (such as facial recognition or language processing) [38]. Near-infrared (NIR) imaging technology, similar to functional magnetic resonance imaging technology, is a noninvasive method for measuring the absorption of near-infrared light through the skull, allowing researchers to speculate on the proxy of nerve activation, which is attributed to the relative changes in oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin concentrations in blood vessels in the cortical structure [39]- [40].…”
Section: Why Meg For Ndds Research?mentioning
confidence: 99%