2011
DOI: 10.7763/ijcee.2011.v3.370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Shield Effectiveness in Low Frequency

Abstract: Abstract-Since the early days of radio and telegraph communications, it has been known that a spark gap generates electromagnetic waves rich in spectral content (frequency components) and that these waves can cause interference or noise in various electronic and electrical devices such as radio receivers and telephone communications. Electromagnetic pulses are fields of energy that they can damage electrical and electronic circuits at once. New technology of microelectronic circuits is sensitive to interferenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[20] The magnetic shielding material we used is permalloy, which has high shielding performance against lowfrequency noise. [21] The magnetic shielding coefficient of our two systems is about 1 × 10 6 for DC magnetic fields and AC magnetic fields above 1 Hz. As for the geomagnetic drift of about 200 nT/day, while the shielding coefficient for low frequencies will decrease, it is still in the order of 10 4 .…”
Section: Current Noise Measurement and Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[20] The magnetic shielding material we used is permalloy, which has high shielding performance against lowfrequency noise. [21] The magnetic shielding coefficient of our two systems is about 1 × 10 6 for DC magnetic fields and AC magnetic fields above 1 Hz. As for the geomagnetic drift of about 200 nT/day, while the shielding coefficient for low frequencies will decrease, it is still in the order of 10 4 .…”
Section: Current Noise Measurement and Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Cabe destacar que se realizó el análisis para el hierro a partir de los datos tomados del laboratorio y comparados con los obtenidos en el análisis teórico y en las simulaciones, donde no se observa que la permeabilidad alcanza su máximo valor; razón por la cual los resultados para este material discrepan para cada uno de los análisis [10,11]. En la figura 2 se observa cómo la eficiencia del cobre tiene un comportamiento creciente hasta cerca de los 50.000 Hz, punto en el cual empieza a descender levemente hasta llegar a los 100.000 Hz; este comportamiento se debe al efecto piel producido por las altas frecuencias a las cuales se somete el material [12,13]; esto hace que la resistencia aumente y, por lo tanto, la corriente tienda a circular por la periferia del material, provocando que la eficiencia de apantallamiento se vea disminuida. Lo mismo sucede para el aluminio en la figura 3, pero este descenso se presenta cerca a los 20.000 Hz [14].…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusionesunclassified
“…Also, the magnetic shielding had proved experimentally that no virtual trigger signal can be generated by an external magnetic field [3]. However, the shape of the magnetic shielding was restricted by the limited space of small arms and the nature of magnetic sensors that can be operated by a particular magnetic field [4]. Because only partial magnetic shielding can be used for the trigger assembly, it may be impossible to fully shield the magnetic sensor against an external magnetic field in any direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%