2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance study of Ce and Gd doped NiFe2O4 nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the dependence of ε on R, its variation reflects the thermal expansion coefficient of the samples when they were annealed, which is assigned to the change of spacing within and/or between the nanoparticles. The increase of ε proves growth of the crystal lattice as T increases [11,26,27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the dependence of ε on R, its variation reflects the thermal expansion coefficient of the samples when they were annealed, which is assigned to the change of spacing within and/or between the nanoparticles. The increase of ε proves growth of the crystal lattice as T increases [11,26,27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is displayed that S increases to a maximum value at 600 C and decreases thereafter, whereas ε has opposite behavior. This can be explained as dependence of S on both R and D x , where S is inversely proportional to R [26]. The negative values of ε reveals compressive strain [26,27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations