Abstract:In vivo MRS is a non-invasive measurement technique used not only in humans, but also in animal models using high-field magnets. MRS enables the measurement of metabolite concentrations as well as metabolic rates and their modifications in healthy animals and disease models. Such data open the way to a deeper understanding of the underlying biochemistry, related disturbances and mechanisms taking place during or prior to symptoms and tissue changes. In this work, we focus on the main preclinical 1 H, 31 P and … Show more
“…We then formed the Experts Working Group on reporting standards for MRS , who support the paper's recommendations with collaborators with more than 5 years of experience in MRS methodology and application, who either have extended years of service as reviewers for the main MRS journals or are editors of those journals. This follows the same pathway to consensus as the other consensus papers in this special issue 6–17 . These consensus papers provide context to these recommendations, and for further details, as indicated throughout the paper, new authors should reference these papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Below we set out in five sections the important pieces of information about an MRS study that are to be considered as either requirements, or recommendations, along with reasons why these are considered important. A more in‐depth description of terminology and abbreviations to be used can be found in the work of Kreis et al, 11 while a fuller discussion of several concepts are to be found in other consensus papers in this special issue 6–17 …”
The translation of MRS to clinical practice has been impeded by the lack of technical standardization. There are multiple methods of acquisition, post-processing, and analysis whose details greatly impact the interpretation of the results. These details are often not fully reported, making it difficult to assess MRS studies on a standardized basis. This hampers the reviewing of manuscripts, limits the reproducibility of study results, and complicates meta-analysis of the literature. In this paper a consensus group of MRS experts provides minimum guidelines for the reporting of MRS methods and results, including the standardized description of MRS hardware, data acquisition, analysis, and quality assessment. This consensus statement describes each of these requirements in detail and includes a checklist to assist authors and journal reviewers and to provide a practical way for journal editors to ensure that MRS studies are reported in full.
“…We then formed the Experts Working Group on reporting standards for MRS , who support the paper's recommendations with collaborators with more than 5 years of experience in MRS methodology and application, who either have extended years of service as reviewers for the main MRS journals or are editors of those journals. This follows the same pathway to consensus as the other consensus papers in this special issue 6–17 . These consensus papers provide context to these recommendations, and for further details, as indicated throughout the paper, new authors should reference these papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Below we set out in five sections the important pieces of information about an MRS study that are to be considered as either requirements, or recommendations, along with reasons why these are considered important. A more in‐depth description of terminology and abbreviations to be used can be found in the work of Kreis et al, 11 while a fuller discussion of several concepts are to be found in other consensus papers in this special issue 6–17 …”
The translation of MRS to clinical practice has been impeded by the lack of technical standardization. There are multiple methods of acquisition, post-processing, and analysis whose details greatly impact the interpretation of the results. These details are often not fully reported, making it difficult to assess MRS studies on a standardized basis. This hampers the reviewing of manuscripts, limits the reproducibility of study results, and complicates meta-analysis of the literature. In this paper a consensus group of MRS experts provides minimum guidelines for the reporting of MRS methods and results, including the standardized description of MRS hardware, data acquisition, analysis, and quality assessment. This consensus statement describes each of these requirements in detail and includes a checklist to assist authors and journal reviewers and to provide a practical way for journal editors to ensure that MRS studies are reported in full.
“…For a detailed discussion of those aspects, please refer to the dedicated paper on this subject in this issue of NMR Biomed. 148 …”
Section: Further General Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a detailed discussion of those aspects, please refer to the dedicated paper on this subject in this issue of NMR Biomed. 148 T A B L E 2 (Continued) This report explains terms that describe context, concepts and terminology relevant for in vivo MR spectroscopy, in particular for the description of MRS methods and the properties of in vivo MR spectra. This has emerged as a consensus among a large group of contributing authors who are experts in the field, as documented by their publication histories.…”
With a 40-year history of use for in vivo studies, the terminology used to describe the methodology and results of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) has grown substantially and is not consistent in many aspects. Given the platform offered by this special issue on advanced MRS methodology, the authors decided to describe many of the implicated terms, to pinpoint differences in their meanings and to suggest
“…The combination of medetomidine and isoflurane is now currently considered one of the most appropriate anesthetic protocols available for the evaluation of murine functional connectivity [ 36 ]. However, the extent to which different anesthesia protocols impact cerebral metabolism is an important topic that remains to be investigated [ 38 ]. Thus, the second aim was to assess the impact of this two anesthetic conditions on the cerebral metabolism of HP [ 2 H 7 , U- 13 C 6 ] Glc and non-HP [6,6′- 2 H 2 ] Glc detected by X-nuclei MRS.…”
Glucose is the primary fuel for the brain; its metabolism is linked with cerebral function. Different magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) techniques are available to assess glucose metabolism, providing complementary information. Our first aim was to investigate the difference between hyperpolarized 13C-glucose MRS and non-hyperpolarized 2H-glucose MRS to interrogate cerebral glycolysis. Isoflurane anesthesia is commonly employed in preclinical MRS, but it affects cerebral hemodynamics and functional connectivity. A combination of low doses of isoflurane and medetomidine is routinely used in rodent fMRI and shows similar functional connectivity, as in awake animals. As glucose metabolism is tightly linked to neuronal activity, our second aim was to assess the impact of these two anesthetic conditions on the cerebral metabolism of glucose. Brain metabolism of hyperpolarized 13C-glucose and 2H-glucose was monitored in two groups of mice in a 9.4 T MRI system. We found that the very different duration and temporal resolution of the two techniques enable highlighting the different aspects in glucose metabolism. We demonstrate (by numerical simulations) that hyperpolarized 13C-glucose reports on de novo lactate synthesis and is sensitive to CMRGlc. We show that variations in cerebral glucose metabolism, under different anesthesia, are reflected differently in hyperpolarized and non-hyperpolarized X-nuclei glucose MRS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.