2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Detectable Metabolomic Fingerprint of Response to Antineoplastic Treatment

Abstract: Targeted therapeutic approaches are increasingly being implemented in the clinic, but early detection of response frequently presents a challenge as many new therapies lead to inhibition of tumor growth rather than tumor shrinkage. Development of novel non-invasive methods to monitor response to treatment is therefore needed. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging are non-invasive imaging methods that can be employed to monitor metabolism, and previous studies indica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cells were incubated with U0126 (LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA, USA) at doses of 50 μ m for PC3 and 25 μ m for MCF‐7 and A375 cells. All treatments were performed over 48 h with matching DMSO solvent controls (1: 1000 in the culture medium), and U0126 was replenished every 24 h. Treatment doses were determined as described previously using the WST‐1 cell proliferation assay (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and doses were selected such that they induced a 50% decrease in cell viability after 48 h of treatment. In all cases, inhibition of the target at the selected drug dose was confirmed by probing for phosphorylated extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (p‐ERK) levels using Western blotting (see below).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were incubated with U0126 (LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA, USA) at doses of 50 μ m for PC3 and 25 μ m for MCF‐7 and A375 cells. All treatments were performed over 48 h with matching DMSO solvent controls (1: 1000 in the culture medium), and U0126 was replenished every 24 h. Treatment doses were determined as described previously using the WST‐1 cell proliferation assay (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and doses were selected such that they induced a 50% decrease in cell viability after 48 h of treatment. In all cases, inhibition of the target at the selected drug dose was confirmed by probing for phosphorylated extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (p‐ERK) levels using Western blotting (see below).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of this approach is that metabolite levels are also affected by the contributions of phospholipases, organic cation transporters, and sphingomyelinases [3, 24, 25]. Moreover, cell death can lead to deceptive decreases in tCho in MR spectra, requiring the measurement of secondary biomarkers [26, 27]. 18 F and 11 C choline PET tracers are useful for identifying ChoK inhibition [28], but choline tracer accumulation can be affected by choline transport inhibitors [29, 30] which have known toxicities [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That glutamine was increased in response to cytotoxic agents is consistent to previous several studies. 31,32 Glutaminolysis is induced by HIF-1 or MYC, which often up-regulated in cancer cell lines. 15,33 After treating cytotoxic agents, glutamine greatly increased in all three treated groups in A549 cells, but decreased in all three treated groups in MRC5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%