Abstract:The LMA-S and i-gel™ differ significantly with regard to in situ position and spatial relationship with adjacent structures assessed by MRI, despite similar clinical and fibreoptical findings. This could be relevant with regard to risk of aspiration, glottic narrowing, and airway resistance and soft-tissue morbidity.
“…In a study with volunteers, Russo et al found that the LMA Supreme protrudes deeper into the upper esophageal sphincter than the i-gel despite fibreoptically identical positions and more compression of the laryngeal inlet by the LMA-Supreme than by the i-gel. 11 Our study suggests that both devices have similar successful insertion rates and equivalent leak and peak inspiratory pressures. These findings are in agreement with those of previous reports.…”
Both the LMA-Supreme and the i-gel offer similar performance for positive pressure ventilation in paralyzed patients during general anesthesia. The i-gel was associated with a slightly faster insertion time and better fibrescopic visualization of the glottis. This trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01001078.
“…In a study with volunteers, Russo et al found that the LMA Supreme protrudes deeper into the upper esophageal sphincter than the i-gel despite fibreoptically identical positions and more compression of the laryngeal inlet by the LMA-Supreme than by the i-gel. 11 Our study suggests that both devices have similar successful insertion rates and equivalent leak and peak inspiratory pressures. These findings are in agreement with those of previous reports.…”
Both the LMA-Supreme and the i-gel offer similar performance for positive pressure ventilation in paralyzed patients during general anesthesia. The i-gel was associated with a slightly faster insertion time and better fibrescopic visualization of the glottis. This trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01001078.
“…This seal is referred to as hypopharyngeal seal pressure (HLP) or 'second seal' (Fig. 1, from [6]). The seal formed with the upper oesophageal sphincter must be effective in both directions, that is, it must protect against gastric insufflation with positive pressure ventilation while also preventing the movement of stomach contents into the respiratory tract in case of regurgitation [7].…”
“…The cause is thought to be the flattened tip of the i-gel that is possibly not inserted far enough into the postcricoid region [6]. The HLP is thus dependent on the particular design of the SGA as well as its correct positioning.…”
The use of second-generation SGA for expanded indications seems useful and safe, provided the contraindications are heeded, the placement and performance tests are successfully completed and there is adequate clinical expertise.
“…Le LMA-Suprême TM semble provoquer plus de fermetures que les autres modè les, à la fois dans l'é tude de Seet et al [2] et dans notre é tude. Une des raisons possibles est la forme du dispositif qui place son extré mité au niveau du sphincter supé rieur de l'oesophage [7] ; un positionnement plus anté rieur peut mettre cette extré mité en contact avec les aryté noïdes ou les cordes vocales et provoquer une fermeture glottique. Le changement de masque, correspondant à un changement de taille, de modè le ou un recours à l'intubation, n'a é té retrouvé que dans une é tude : Theiler et al ont comparé l'I-Gel TM et le LMA-Suprême TM chez 60 patients pré sentant des critè res d'intubation difficile [8].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.