2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00255-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Cervical Spine: Frequency of Degenerative Changes in the Intervertebral Disc with Relation to Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the fact that the subjects represented a population selected with very special criteria. Most changes were located in the lower cervical spine, which is contrary to the study of Abdulkarim et al [1] which suggested that findings in the cervical spine are distributed evenly at a young age but tend to occur in the lower disks with increasing age. If imaging of the neck and back were used in selection, some challenging questions -such as what would be considered critical or predictive findings, and how criteria for the rejection of asymptomatic recruits with pathological findings should be established -would need to be thoroughly discussed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the fact that the subjects represented a population selected with very special criteria. Most changes were located in the lower cervical spine, which is contrary to the study of Abdulkarim et al [1] which suggested that findings in the cervical spine are distributed evenly at a young age but tend to occur in the lower disks with increasing age. If imaging of the neck and back were used in selection, some challenging questions -such as what would be considered critical or predictive findings, and how criteria for the rejection of asymptomatic recruits with pathological findings should be established -would need to be thoroughly discussed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…24,49,50,69 The most common neurological finding is sensibility disturbance, as motor changes are uncommon. 1,15,27,46,49,50,69 Evidence suggests that poor recovery in musculoskeletal pain, especially in neck disorders, [60][61][62] is associated with widespread sensory hypersensitivity (central hyperexcitability). 13,20,21,34,60,72,73 Generalized sensory hypoesthesia (hyposensitivity) and hyperesthesia (hypersensitivity) are a common feature in chronic neck disorder.…”
Section: T T Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N eck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder 1,3,4,9,17,24,51 that has a yearly prevalence estimated at roughly 30% to 50% in the general population. 6,10,16,22,24,25 Almost everyone experiences neck pain at some point in their lifetime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 In addition, conclusions from past research showed that when degeneration begins at C5, the inferior C6, followed by the superior C4, are the segments that are immediately affected. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Literature studies that have documented the effects of a degenerated segment on the adjacent-segment discs have not addressed the effects on adjacent-segment posterior facets. 7,8 Such as discs, posterior facets are also important structures for the load transmission.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%