2016
DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2016.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Metastasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these properties of such nano-emulsions exactly coincide with the ones described above for the best MRI contrast agents ( e.g . T 1 -weighted gadoxetate disodium 17 ), and not yet fulfilled and available for CT. Our objective here is to increase the precision of the tools available for CT and micro-CT, generally being ca . 30% less precise than the MRI modalities 18 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All these properties of such nano-emulsions exactly coincide with the ones described above for the best MRI contrast agents ( e.g . T 1 -weighted gadoxetate disodium 17 ), and not yet fulfilled and available for CT. Our objective here is to increase the precision of the tools available for CT and micro-CT, generally being ca . 30% less precise than the MRI modalities 18 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, if this diagnosis approach is comparable with the one undertaken for the detection of liver metastasis 17 , the strength of MRI lies in several physical techniques giving complementary information, like (i) fat-suppressed T 2 -weihted imaged for determining the tumor location, (ii) contrast-enhanced T 1 -weighted images that show a ring enhancement around the tumor, and (iii) confirmed by diffusion-weighted sequence. Overall the clinic experience reported that MRI modality allows identifying metastasis unseen by US, CT or PET-CT 17 . Particularly, compared to contrast-enhanced MRI, the CT was recognized around 30% less precise 18 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was unexpected that lesion size did not affect the diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting CRLMs. Contemporary MRI has deficits in the detection of small metastatic liver lesions, especially those smaller than 3 mm 8 . In a previous meta-analysis 43 , the accuracy of MRI in detecting CRLM between lesions smaller and larger than 10 mm was significantly different.…”
Section: Covariates Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current diagnostic methods used for the evaluation of CRLM are heterogeneous. Among various imaging methods, such as computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET) combined with CT and ultrasonography (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has its superiority in LM detection due to its superior soft tissue resolution, multiple scan sequences, innovative MRI techniques, and the use of hepatocyte-specific contrast agents 8 . Recent studies have shown that liver MRI performed excellently in determining CRLM with both high sensitivity and specificity [9][10][11] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%