2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: Correlation with clinical findings and electrophysiological investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, MRI provides an excellent visualisation of the median nerve and of its links with the other carpal tunnel structures and, in particular, it allows for the individuation of either nerve adhesion or compression. Last, a correlation between some MRI parameters and the level of electrophysiologic severity has recently been demonstrated [19,20].…”
Section: Diagnostic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, MRI provides an excellent visualisation of the median nerve and of its links with the other carpal tunnel structures and, in particular, it allows for the individuation of either nerve adhesion or compression. Last, a correlation between some MRI parameters and the level of electrophysiologic severity has recently been demonstrated [19,20].…”
Section: Diagnostic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most of the studies accept EMG as the gold standard and attempt to determine the accuracy of other tests in comparison with EMG. 1,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EMG, US, CT, and MRI for the diagnosis of CTS with the use of the clinical findings as the gold standard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enlargement of the cross sectional area of the median nerve at the level of distal radio-ulnar joint and at the level of pisiform bone or at the entrance to the tunnel was found to be of diagnostic value for idiopathic CTS in the majority of cases studied (Martins et al, 2008;Uchiyama et al, 2005;Jarvik et al, 2002;Almann et al;Mesgarzadeh et al, 1995;Monagle et al;Kleindienst et al, 1996;Kleindienst et al, 1998). However, several investigators have shown a larger cross-sectional area of the nerve in CTS groups than in controls, even at the hook of the hamate bone level (Almann et al;Mesgarzadeh et al, 1995;Monagle et al).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%