B reast cancer is the most common cancer in women, accounting for over 2 million new cases annually worldwide (1). Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents 15%-20% of all breast cancers and is defined by low or absent expression of hormone receptors and lack of amplification or overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2). Therefore, TNBC lacks any established targeted treatment options, such as endocrine or anti-HER2 therapy. Compared with other subtypes of breast cancer, TNBC has an adverse overall outcome, but it often shows good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (2). In contrast to adjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy allows assessment of treatment response in situ and downstaging of the tumor prior to surgery (2). Furthermore, complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important prognostic factor in patients with TNBC, as it is indicative of longer event-free and overall survival (3,4). Early prediction of pathologic complete response at imaging would assist patient care and has been demonstrated using several approaches, including multiparametric proton MRI, but it remains challenging owing to the low accuracy of these techniques (5,6). The delayed identification of nonresponders results in increased patient morbidity from side effects as well as a risk of metastases from chemoresistant cells; it also has substantial economic implications (7).