2010
DOI: 10.1155/2010/292071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Patient with a Dual Chamber Pacemaker

Abstract: Having a pacemaker has been seen an absolute contraindication to having an MRI scan. This has become increasingly difficult in clinical practice as insertion of pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators is at an all time high. Here we outline a case where a 71-year-old male patient with a permanent pacemaker needed to have an MRI scan to ascertain the aetiology of his condition and help guide further management. Given this clinical dilemma, an emergency clinical ethics consultation was arranged. As a r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MRI helps to clearly describe soft tissue pathology and to determine the extent of damage, as well as to help distinguish CES from other conditions such as aortic dissection or spinal infarction. The disadvantage of MRI is that it cannot be used in patients with pacemaker or poor tolerance due to claustrophobia 6,16 . Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not as clearly de ned as computed tomography (CT) but it is better at displaying soft tissues such as a disc, ligament, dural sac and nerve roots 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MRI helps to clearly describe soft tissue pathology and to determine the extent of damage, as well as to help distinguish CES from other conditions such as aortic dissection or spinal infarction. The disadvantage of MRI is that it cannot be used in patients with pacemaker or poor tolerance due to claustrophobia 6,16 . Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not as clearly de ned as computed tomography (CT) but it is better at displaying soft tissues such as a disc, ligament, dural sac and nerve roots 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome and helps distinguish it from diagnoses such as aortic dissection or spinal infarction 6 . Myelography and CT (computed tomography) Myelography can be useful alternatives for patients who cannot have an MRI, but it is an invasive technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The psychosocial aspect or presence of back pain and other urological dysfunction may inhibit the patient to volunteer sexual dysfunction. 18 4,19 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) do not define bone as clearly as computed tomography (CT) but is better at showing soft tissues such as intervertebral disc, ligamentum flavum, dural sac, and nerve roots. 19 Plain films are generally unhelpful in the investigation of a herniated disc but can provide valuable information in the setting of acute trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the accepted gold standard modality of choice for diagnosing CES which identifies potential mimics such as aortic dissection or spinal infarction. 4 Myelography and CT Myelography is used as an alternative for patients not suitable for MRI but have the disadvantage of being invasive techniques. 5 Most cases of cauda equina syndrome are caused by herniation of the lumbar disc, for which the surgery indicated is decompression at the level of the herniation, usually involving discectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%