2011
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of Crohnʼs disease

Abstract: The MRI variables that should be evaluated in clinical practice to diagnose active CD and severe CD are validated, as well as the quantitative index of activity for use in research studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
164
5
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 422 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
164
5
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, it would be interesting to evaluate a correlation among different parameters on multi-point scales; however, in the absence of a quantitative score for CTE, we preferred to adapt the clinical and endoscopic scale to the qualitative CTE score, using a 3-grade scale of severity, converting the numeric continuous values of HBi and SES-CD/Rutgeerts score in 3 categories as reported in the literature [9, 12, 13]. This limit of CTE scan could be resolved using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), allowing a quantitative evaluation of transmural activity, through the use of the validated activity score MaRIA [24, 25]. However, when this study started, CTE was a more available technique compared to MRI; thus, we decided to include only patients undergoing to CTE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, it would be interesting to evaluate a correlation among different parameters on multi-point scales; however, in the absence of a quantitative score for CTE, we preferred to adapt the clinical and endoscopic scale to the qualitative CTE score, using a 3-grade scale of severity, converting the numeric continuous values of HBi and SES-CD/Rutgeerts score in 3 categories as reported in the literature [9, 12, 13]. This limit of CTE scan could be resolved using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), allowing a quantitative evaluation of transmural activity, through the use of the validated activity score MaRIA [24, 25]. However, when this study started, CTE was a more available technique compared to MRI; thus, we decided to include only patients undergoing to CTE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, various MRE indices have been derived to evaluate disease activity in CD [4], but only the magnetic resonance index of activity (MaRIA) [5,6] and London indices [7] have been constructed using a structured process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of MRI for detection of activity is high, with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 90% [8,16,[23][24][25][26][27]. Similar diagnostic accuracy for both CT and MRI techniques has been shown in different studies that directly compare both imaging modalities [16,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Comparison Of Mri To Other Cross-sectional Imaging Techniquementioning
confidence: 68%
“…In contrast, MRI changes are similar in all colonic segments and terminal ileum, with the exception of enlarged lymph nodes that are predominantly associated with the presence of inflammatory lesions in the ascending colon and terminal ileum [6,8]. The earliest macroscopic lesions of active CD are erythema and superficial aphthoid ulcerations [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation