2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging findings in 40 dogs with histologically confirmed intracranial tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
195
2
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
8
195
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In both human and veterinary medicine, the pattern of contrast enhancement has been used to evaluate tumor type,4, 5 predict seizure risk in cases of intracranial neoplasia,31 and differentiate neoplastic from non‐neoplastic lesions, such as postoperative scar tissue, irradiation injury, inflammation or cerebrovascular lesions 3, 32, 33. However, contrast enhancement patterns do not consistently reflect the histologic features of an intracranial lesion, with no association between MR images and histologic findings in approximately 25% of cases in 1 veterinary study 34…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both human and veterinary medicine, the pattern of contrast enhancement has been used to evaluate tumor type,4, 5 predict seizure risk in cases of intracranial neoplasia,31 and differentiate neoplastic from non‐neoplastic lesions, such as postoperative scar tissue, irradiation injury, inflammation or cerebrovascular lesions 3, 32, 33. However, contrast enhancement patterns do not consistently reflect the histologic features of an intracranial lesion, with no association between MR images and histologic findings in approximately 25% of cases in 1 veterinary study 34…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings observed on postcontrast sequences may assist in the further characterization of a brain lesion observed on precontrast sequences 3, 4, 5. However, the routine administration of gadolinium‐based contrast media has been questioned for human patients, especially if no lesion is observed on precontrast sequences 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many investigators have attempted to utilize a variety of imaging techniques to diagnose, and even grade, intracranial lesions in dogs, specificity, sensitivity, or both have been shown to be consistently suboptimal in numerous studies,12, 15, 16, 36, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 particularly when applied to clinically relevant prospective random populations of patients. A majority of intracranial tumors in both dogs and cats are hypo‐ to isointense on T1‐weighted imaging, and hyperintense on T2‐weighted imaging.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of intracranial tumors in both dogs and cats are hypo‐ to isointense on T1‐weighted imaging, and hyperintense on T2‐weighted imaging. The majority are also contrast enhancing after administration of gadolinium‐based contrast agents 12, 15, 16, 21, 54, 55. A variety of tumor “specific” findings relating to MRI have been reported variably in several studies, some of which are listed below.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20][21] According to most recent studies, the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) criteria for presumptive diagnosis of meningioma were: the occurrence of a single solid broad dural based extra-axial mass with distinct margins and the presence of intense and uniform enhancement with a dural tail sign.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%