2011
DOI: 10.3171/2010.5.jns10307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging dynamics of contrast medium uptake in vestibular schwannomas

Abstract: Contrast enhancement in VS MR imaging varies according to the duration of the delay between contrast agent administration and image acquisition. Postradiotherapy changes in contrast enhancement of VS can therefore not be attributed only to effective radiotherapy. So-called "loss of central contrast enhancement" may be falsely detected because of timing. A standardized protocol with defined timing of image acquisition may increase comparability of contrast uptake in VS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data are in line with the second hypothesis, because the positive correlation between tumor size and EES volume was lost in cystic VSs, the mean Ve being 53% lower in the cystic portions than in the solid portions. In previous studies, the non-enhancing (cystic) portions of VSs have been shown to decrease significantly over time, with slow contrast uptake in up to 90% of the cystic portions ( 34 ) , further confirming that cystic portions have different contrast uptake dynamics and that the cysts are cellular rather than liquid cavities, which explains the differences we found between the cystic and solid portions of cystic VSs in terms of perfusion and EES volume.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our data are in line with the second hypothesis, because the positive correlation between tumor size and EES volume was lost in cystic VSs, the mean Ve being 53% lower in the cystic portions than in the solid portions. In previous studies, the non-enhancing (cystic) portions of VSs have been shown to decrease significantly over time, with slow contrast uptake in up to 90% of the cystic portions ( 34 ) , further confirming that cystic portions have different contrast uptake dynamics and that the cysts are cellular rather than liquid cavities, which explains the differences we found between the cystic and solid portions of cystic VSs in terms of perfusion and EES volume.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…When the tumor increased, MRI was performed at 6-month intervals. The same protocol of T1-weighted MR imaging with standard timing of gadolinium injection was applied for image acquisition during the radiosurgical procedure and all follow-up MR imaging, to avoid changes in contrast enhancement due to variations in timing of injection and acquisition [3]. Evolution of the tumor volume and changes in contrast enhancement of the tumor were assessed on MR images co-registered on the follow-up module of Leksell GammaPlan 9.0.…”
Section: Radiosurgery Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%