The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance-guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Final Results on Patient-reported Outcomes of a Prospective Phase 2 Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data were recently updated with a final PROMs analysis after one year of follow-up, which confirmed the absence of G ≥ 3 adverse events. Furthermore, at 12 months after the end of treatment, QoL returned to baseline conditions, with only 2% of patients reporting persistent bowel symptoms [33].…”
Section: Mr-guided Radiotherapy: Present Evidencementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data were recently updated with a final PROMs analysis after one year of follow-up, which confirmed the absence of G ≥ 3 adverse events. Furthermore, at 12 months after the end of treatment, QoL returned to baseline conditions, with only 2% of patients reporting persistent bowel symptoms [33].…”
Section: Mr-guided Radiotherapy: Present Evidencementioning
confidence: 92%
“…For both devices, given the relatively longer treatment time per session, the simulation process is a crucial factor in order to perform an accurate and refined treatment delivery. Based on available literature, most experiences reported a similar protocol in terms of bladder filling and rectal emptying ( [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]-see Table 1). For both the CT scan (performed for dose calculation purposes) and the MRI scan, patients were educated to have a half-full bladder in order to take into account residual volume changes during the plan adaptation phase (Figure 2).…”
Section: Mr-guided Radiotherapy: Present Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tetar et al ( 49 ) recently provided an update on the VU series with toxicity information extending through one year of follow-up. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported.…”
Section: Published Literature On Prostate Mrgrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent introduction of integrated magnetic resonance (MR) linear accelerators (linacs) into clinical practice has opened new perspectives for radiation therapy (RT), offering the advantages of coupling 0.35 or 1.5 T on-board MR scanners firstly with a triplet of 60 Co heads and later with 6 and 7 MV linacs in stand-alone hybrid units ( 1 3 ). MR guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has been successfully applied to several anatomical sites, exploiting online adaptive planning solutions and innovative motion management, with improved dosimetric performance and early clinical results suggesting improved efficacy and toxicity reduction ( 4 6 ). Despite the numerous explored applications, the published clinical evidence is still scarce, and the actual quantification of the advantages of using such an advanced technology is still the object of debate in the radiation oncology community ( 7 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%