2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Guided Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancers

Abstract: Radiotherapy is an integral component of head/neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) treatment, and technological developments including advances in image-guided radiotherapy over the past decades have offered improvements in the technical treatment of these cancers. Integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into image guidance through the development of MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) offers further potential for refinement of the techniques by which HNSCCs are treated. This article provides an overview … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work has illustrated that MRI-derived parameters are predictive of treatment response after 70 Gy of chemoradiation for head and neck cancer 43-46 ; however, its role in de-escalation remains an active area of investigation. We were not able to predict hypoxia resolution on the basis of MRI parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has illustrated that MRI-derived parameters are predictive of treatment response after 70 Gy of chemoradiation for head and neck cancer 43-46 ; however, its role in de-escalation remains an active area of investigation. We were not able to predict hypoxia resolution on the basis of MRI parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore expect that the clinical implementation of MRI-based auto-delineation will be enabled by the novel evolutions in MRI-guided RT for HNC, e.g. MRI simulation [27,28]. Substantial differences in GTV delineation among ROs have been observed in the past, mainly driven by clinical experience and expertise [2,3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the current standard for a diagnostic MRI is a 3 Tesla (T) magnet, the two currently available MR-Linac machines offer 0.35 T and 1.5 T magnets, respectively. The 0.35 T magnet offers many benefits, such as higher frames per second, faster tissue tracking, and lower electron return effect, but it is yet to be determined if it will offer sufficient image quality to translate in clinically impactful effects for head and neck cancer patients [ 62 ].…”
Section: Current Challenges and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional shielding on the MR-Linac is also needed to compensate for the mutually detrimental effects of the linear accelerator components and the magnetic field of the MRI, adding significant complexity to gantry design. The complexity and added weight of the gantry preclude simultaneous rotation and treatment delivery, currently limiting its application to static IMRT [ 62 ]. This is a particularly important barrier to the adoption of MRgRT in head and neck cancers, as the now standard volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is associated with better sparing of critical organs at risk such as the brainstem, parotid, esophagus, and oral cavity [ 64 ].…”
Section: Current Challenges and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%