2021
DOI: 10.1002/hep.32145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance elastography plus Fibrosis‐4 versus FibroScan–aspartate aminotransferase in detection of candidates for pharmacological treatment of NASH‐related fibrosis

Abstract: Background and Aims: Patients with NAFLD with significant hepatic fibrosis (Stage ≥ 2) are at increased risk of liver-related morbidity and are candidates for pharmacologic therapies. In this study, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of MEFIB (the combination of magnetic resonance elastography [MRE] and ) and FAST (FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase; combined liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, controlled attenuation parameter, and aspartate aminotransferase) for d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the accuracy of liver biopsy, it has been shown to have a high rate of sampling error as the liver may have both focal and whole histopathological changes due to its volume. To supplement this uncertainty, FibroScan and magnetic resonance imaging may be useful modalities to combine with liver biopsy [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Nonetheless, we did not apply these modalities in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the accuracy of liver biopsy, it has been shown to have a high rate of sampling error as the liver may have both focal and whole histopathological changes due to its volume. To supplement this uncertainty, FibroScan and magnetic resonance imaging may be useful modalities to combine with liver biopsy [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Nonetheless, we did not apply these modalities in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the absence of a central review of histologic findings by independent pathologists blinded to the clinical data might critically affect the diagnosis of NASH by various criteria, which could disturb the predictive performance of the FAST score in this study. Fourth, further comparison using a magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-based model, which reported higher accuracy in detecting significant fibrosis ( 30 ), was impossible due to the lack of paired MRE data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study comparing the diagnostic accuracy between MEFIB and FAST for significant fibrosis, MEFIB has higher diagnostic accuracy than FAST for significant fibrosis. 85 (FibroScan)-based assessment may be used in centers where MRI is not readily available.…”
Section: Candidates For Pharmacological Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%