2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1704-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance defecography versus clinical examination and fluoroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: MRD has a role in the assessment of pelvic floor dysfunction. However, clinicians need to be mindful of the risk of underdiagnosis and consider the use of additional imaging.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other exams have been evaluated as dynamic MRI. As this exam is poorly correlated to patient-reported symptom severity (69,70), its place is restricted to patients with an externalized or suspected prolapse.…”
Section: Functional Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other exams have been evaluated as dynamic MRI. As this exam is poorly correlated to patient-reported symptom severity (69,70), its place is restricted to patients with an externalized or suspected prolapse.…”
Section: Functional Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic defecography has many advantages in helping us to understand the pelvic floor movement [16][17][18] . Some authors used dynamic MR defecography for evaluating the pelvic floor disease but MR defecography is expensive and not very convenient clinically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recognised that with MRI alone, rectoceles, intussusception and perineal descent may be missed 58 and it can be difficult to demonstrate complete emptying of the rectal ampulla, hence some centres perform both fluoroscopic and MRI examinations to evaluate the anatomy and function in a complementary fashion. It is likely that these limitations of MRI could be overcome by imaging the patient in a more physiological sitting position, and although there have been promising studies of sitting patients in open-magnet MR units, [59][60][61] the patient numbers are low and further studies are required.…”
Section: The Case Of Mri Defecographymentioning
confidence: 99%