1996
DOI: 10.1097/00019501-199608000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance coronary angiography in heart transplant recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, MR coronary angiography has been reported to be clinically relevant in determining the origin and course of anomalous coronary arteries [19][20][21] for the follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patencies [7,22] and in donor-recipient anastomoses for heart transplantation [23,24]. Nevertheless, the precise role of MR coronary angiography in depicting coronary artery atheromatosis and coronary artery stenosis must be still identified, although recent results have shown that MR coronary angiography is promising in detecting stenotic coronary artery lesions at the proximal and middle part of the vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, MR coronary angiography has been reported to be clinically relevant in determining the origin and course of anomalous coronary arteries [19][20][21] for the follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patencies [7,22] and in donor-recipient anastomoses for heart transplantation [23,24]. Nevertheless, the precise role of MR coronary angiography in depicting coronary artery atheromatosis and coronary artery stenosis must be still identified, although recent results have shown that MR coronary angiography is promising in detecting stenotic coronary artery lesions at the proximal and middle part of the vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metallic clips and sternal sutures did not hamper these image assessments, although they might cause surrounding signal loss, create difficulties in shimming for fat-signal suppression, and preclude evaluation of coronary arteries. 36 Whereas no false-positive segments were detected, MRCA revealed 10 false-negative segments, 9 of which were graded as wall thickening by CCAG, presumably because of insufficient spatial resolution and contrast-tonoise ratio for distal lesions. In addition, 8 true-positive segments, which were graded as stenosis, were identified.…”
Section: Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy By Mdct and Mrcamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To our knowledge, only a few previous studies have compared whole-heart MRCA with CCAG for the feasibility of detecting significant coronary arterial stenosis in heart transplant recipients. 12, 36 The feasibility of this current whole-heart technique has not been established for detecting CAV, which has a more challenging etiology than CAD. In this study, the sensitivity of CAV detection was 60.0%, and the specificity of wholeheart MRCA was 100%.…”
Section: Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy By Mdct and Mrcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A RMC pode ainda ajudar a detectar doença arterial coronária associada ao transplante cardíaco 326 , complicações como doenças pericárdicas, massas intracavitárias 327 e os efeitos do tratamento de medicamentoso 328 no remodelamento associado ao uso prolongado de ciclosporina .…”
Section: Transplante Cardíacounclassified