2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.04.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance and conductivity study of gelatin-based proton conductor polymer electrolytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5, at the nitrogen hyperfine frequencies, is an indication of strong electron-nitrogen couplings. This result is very similar to what has been observed before [18] and indicates that both, the 1 H nuclei (of the gelatin and the plasticizer) and the 14 N nuclei (of the glycine and proline groups of the gelatin) are close enough to interact with the copper ion. These two different environments for the copper can explain the observation of two different copper species in the CW-EPR spectrum.…”
Section: Electron Paramagnetic Resonancesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…5, at the nitrogen hyperfine frequencies, is an indication of strong electron-nitrogen couplings. This result is very similar to what has been observed before [18] and indicates that both, the 1 H nuclei (of the gelatin and the plasticizer) and the 14 N nuclei (of the glycine and proline groups of the gelatin) are close enough to interact with the copper ion. These two different environments for the copper can explain the observation of two different copper species in the CW-EPR spectrum.…”
Section: Electron Paramagnetic Resonancesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It is possible to observe that the ionic conductivity increases monotonically with HCl concentration. It should be noted that these conductivity values are higher than those obtained before for the gelatin-based electrolyte prepared with acetic acid [18], but a quantitative comparison among these two systems is difficult to be established because of their different acid concentration: 18 wt% for the latter electrolyte compared to 0.1 M (i.e. 1 wt%) for the former one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations