2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Rayleigh–Taylor instability in radiative flows

Abstract: We present a linear analysis of the radiative Rayleigh-Taylor (RT) instability in the presence of magnetic field for both optically thin and thick regimes. When the flow is optically thin, magnetic field not only stabilizes perturbations with short wavelengths, but also growth rate of the instability at long wavelengths is reduced compared to a nonmagnetized case. Then, we extend our analysis to the optically thick flows with a conserved total specific entropy and properties of the unstable perturbations are i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Krumholz et al 2005a;Keto 2007;Krumholz et al 2009;Kuiper et al 2011;Klassen et al 2016). Radiative bubbles around massive protostars cannot prevent the accretion of the infalling gas onto the star-disk system, because such bubbles are Rayleigh-Taylor unstable at early times (Rosen et al 2016) and the instability is expected to occur even in the magnetized case, though with a longer growth time-scale (Yaghoobi & Shadmehri 2018). Although the precise role of the various radiative feedback mechanisms remains difficult to quantify, here we focus on the origin of massive stars, that is the initial conditions responsible for their creation, and on the source and timescale of the accretion process, neglecting radiative feedback.…”
Section: Caveats and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krumholz et al 2005a;Keto 2007;Krumholz et al 2009;Kuiper et al 2011;Klassen et al 2016). Radiative bubbles around massive protostars cannot prevent the accretion of the infalling gas onto the star-disk system, because such bubbles are Rayleigh-Taylor unstable at early times (Rosen et al 2016) and the instability is expected to occur even in the magnetized case, though with a longer growth time-scale (Yaghoobi & Shadmehri 2018). Although the precise role of the various radiative feedback mechanisms remains difficult to quantify, here we focus on the origin of massive stars, that is the initial conditions responsible for their creation, and on the source and timescale of the accretion process, neglecting radiative feedback.…”
Section: Caveats and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the cluster is not initially in direct contact with the ISM as the region inside the hot bubble (𝑅 < 𝑅 eq ) is filled with a low-density gas (𝜌 ∼ 10 −31 g cm −3 ) formed by SNe ejecta and is in hydrostatic equilibrium with the cluster. By ignoring the dynamical instabilities of the bubble such as radiative Rayleigh-Taylor instability (Jacquet & Krumholz 2011;Yaghoobi & Shadmehri 2018), we can assume that the cluster traverses the radius of 𝑅 eq and arrives at the interface of the ISM at time 𝑡 I , after which it starts accreting pristine gas from the ISM. In our setup, it is assumed that the relative speed of the cluster with respect to the ISM is 23 km s −1 and remains constant.…”
Section: Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the cluster is not initially in direct contact with the ISM as the MNRAS 517, 4175-4186 (2022) region inside the hot bubble ( R < R eq ) is filled with a low-density gas ( ρ ∼ 10 −31 g cm −3 ) formed by SNe ejecta and is in hydrostatic equilibrium with the cluster. By ignoring the dynamical instabilities of the bubble, such as RT Rayleigh-Taylor instability (Jacquet & Krumholz 2011 ;Yaghoobi & Shadmehri 2018 ), we can assume that the cluster traverses the radius of R eq and arrives at the interface of the ISM at time t I , after which it starts accreting pristine gas from the ISM. In our setup, it is assumed that the relative speed of the cluster with respect to the ISM is 23 km s −1 and remains constant.…”
Section: Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%