2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-013-1514-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoparticles prepared by seeded-growth route

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Nevertheless one has to be aware that the anisotropy constant of a single particle changes with the reduction of its size, and also magnetic inter-particle interactions lead to an enhancement of the magnetic anisotropy of the system. 28 Using the experimental measured values of T B for the four iron oxide particle sizes, 4, 5, 8 and 10 nm infiltrated within SiNTs (assuming that they do not interact), one can estimate K 1 values as follows: for 10 nm particles (T B = 30 K) K 1 = 1.98 × 10 4 J m −3 , 8 nm particles (T B = 20 K) K 1 = 2.5 × 10 4 J m −3 , 5 nm particles (T B = 15 K) K 1 = 7.9 × 10 4 J m −3 and for 4 nm particles (T B = 12 K) K 1 = 1.2 × 10 5 J m −3 . These values deviate from the bulk-value and they are also higher than those reported by Luo et al which deals with a frozen ferrofluid, 29 where magnetic interactions can be neglected.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Nevertheless one has to be aware that the anisotropy constant of a single particle changes with the reduction of its size, and also magnetic inter-particle interactions lead to an enhancement of the magnetic anisotropy of the system. 28 Using the experimental measured values of T B for the four iron oxide particle sizes, 4, 5, 8 and 10 nm infiltrated within SiNTs (assuming that they do not interact), one can estimate K 1 values as follows: for 10 nm particles (T B = 30 K) K 1 = 1.98 × 10 4 J m −3 , 8 nm particles (T B = 20 K) K 1 = 2.5 × 10 4 J m −3 , 5 nm particles (T B = 15 K) K 1 = 7.9 × 10 4 J m −3 and for 4 nm particles (T B = 12 K) K 1 = 1.2 × 10 5 J m −3 . These values deviate from the bulk-value and they are also higher than those reported by Luo et al which deals with a frozen ferrofluid, 29 where magnetic interactions can be neglected.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic nanocrystals are an appealing subject of study because they exhibit a vastly different physical behavior from that in their bulk counterparts [8]. Magnetism is a quantum mechanical property, and as such, nanoscale size and shape particle modifications can lead to its evolution in an unexpected way [9,10]. For these reasons, a variety of methodologies have been utilized, but among them, the surfactant-assisted chemical approaches hold a prominent place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because their complex structure may attain collective properties 22 due to the coupling mechanisms established across the interfaced or strongly coupled material nanodomains 5,23,24 . In addition, the magnetic behavior of these complex systems may be affected by microscopic phenomena associated with the surface coordination environment, such as, canted surface spins 25 , intraand inter-particle interactions (dipolar or exchange, involving surface spins among different particles) 3,26,27 and even increased surface anisotropy 28 . Understanding of such effects is a key in the exploitation of these systems in applications strongly related to their magnetization, such as, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhancement 7,14,20,29 , magnetic hyperthermia 30,31 and even targeted drug delivery 9,32,33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%