2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3672444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic properties of Fe chains on Cu2N/Cu(100): A density functional theory study

Abstract: High field nuclear magnetic resonance in transition metal substituted BaFe2As2Are trinuclear superhalogens promising candidates for building blocks of novel magnetic materials? A theoretical prospect from combined broken-symmetry density functional theory and ab initio study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(27 reference statements)
10
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming a Heisenberg Hamiltonian, we estimate a value of 4.8 meV from the calculated energy difference E = 2S 2 J = 60 meV and a spin S = 5/2. The AFM ground state for Fe chains agrees with the ground state found for Fe dimers and trimers calculated by using GGA + U [31,32] by Nicklas et al [33]. Their estimate of the effective interaction for the dimer, J = 28 meV, and trimer, J = 34 meV, are in good agreement with the J = 40 meV estimated by ourselves from the energy difference E = 180 meV and a spin S = 3/2.…”
Section: Calculation Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Assuming a Heisenberg Hamiltonian, we estimate a value of 4.8 meV from the calculated energy difference E = 2S 2 J = 60 meV and a spin S = 5/2. The AFM ground state for Fe chains agrees with the ground state found for Fe dimers and trimers calculated by using GGA + U [31,32] by Nicklas et al [33]. Their estimate of the effective interaction for the dimer, J = 28 meV, and trimer, J = 34 meV, are in good agreement with the J = 40 meV estimated by ourselves from the energy difference E = 180 meV and a spin S = 3/2.…”
Section: Calculation Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In the second stage, the meshes used were 8 × 8 × 1 for the small supercell and 6 × 6 × 1 for the big one. In all the calculations we used a smearing with a broadening parameter of 0.005-0.02 Ry, in line with previous work [21,29,31], and we fixed the cutoff energies for the wave function and charge density at 40-80 Ry and 400-800 Ry respectively. For the ELK calculations, we started from the relaxed structures obtained with QE.…”
Section: A Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density functional theory (DFT) calculations, most of them [2,21,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] dealing with Ti, Mn, Fe, and Co adatoms on Cu 2 N/Cu(100), show that nor the charge, neither the magnetic moment of these magnetic atoms are quantized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very long lifetimes in the system are very sensitive to small variations in the magnetic structure parameters (exchange coupling and anisotropies). Computation of magnetic structure parameters have been performed via configuration interaction or DFT approaches for a variety of nanostructures at surfaces systems 15,18,19,20,43,44,45,46,47 . Further studies by ab initio approaches on the present system could be highly conclusive, despite the current difficulties in accurately computing magnetic structure parameters 48,49 .…”
Section: Concluding Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, atomic-scale logical devices have been assembled using atom manipulation techniques. A variety of magnetic nanostructures, and in particular of chains of magnetic atoms, have been built and analysed in STM experiments 8,9,10,11,12,13,14 that has triggered a series of associated or parallel theoretical studies 15,16,17,18,19,20,21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%