1988
DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(88)90367-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic properties and crystal field in MgYb2S4 and MgYb2Se4 spinels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, there does not appear to have been direct measurements of the crystal field spectrum, and thus the composition of the ground doublet, for any of the ytterbium spinels. While several estimates [27,43,44,74] exist in the literature, they are based on fitting of the magnetic susceptibility and use restricted, mostly cubic, ansatzes for the crystal field interaction parameters. These thus produce nearly perfect Γ 6 ground state doublets and thus essentially reproduce the results of Sec.…”
Section: A Spinelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there does not appear to have been direct measurements of the crystal field spectrum, and thus the composition of the ground doublet, for any of the ytterbium spinels. While several estimates [27,43,44,74] exist in the literature, they are based on fitting of the magnetic susceptibility and use restricted, mostly cubic, ansatzes for the crystal field interaction parameters. These thus produce nearly perfect Γ 6 ground state doublets and thus essentially reproduce the results of Sec.…”
Section: A Spinelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For MgYb 2 Se 4 , we find g = 5.188(79) and g ⊥ = 0.923(85) µ B , implying an effective spin with strong anisotropy along the 111 direction while falling far short of the Ising limit. These values imply significantly more anisotropy than the values of g = 3.564 and g ⊥ = 2.204 obtained from rescaling the CEF parameters from our previous MgEr 2 Se 4 results [31,55], and are even farther removed from reports of nearly isotropic spins determined from fits of inverse magnetic susceptibility curves [40,50]. Comparing the CEF parameters from these and the current study, the starkest contrast lay in the signs of B 43 and B 63 parameters and the magnitude of B 20 .…”
Section: Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…For MgYb 2 Se 4 , the parameters B 6m |m = 0, 3, 6 have little consequence on the relative sizes of g and g ⊥ , and on the goodness of the fit to our data, however both B 20 and the ratio between B 40 and B 43 are strongly associated with trigonal fields and thus the tendency of moments to point in the 111 directions. The magnetic susceptibility studies [40,50] underestimate the B 20 parameter and, more consequentially, fix the ratio between B 40 and B 43 to that expected in a perfect octahedral en- vironment. This hugely underestimates the contribution to the potential from the next nearest neighbor atoms, and is likely responsible for the resultant underestimation of the anisotropy of the Yb 3+ ions.…”
Section: Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4.. The crystal field states of the chalcogenide spinels were first studied in the 1970's [43][44][45][46][47]. The accuracy of these studies was limited by their assumption of a perfect octahedral environment and also because magnetization data alone was used for the refinements of the CEF Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Rare Earth Chalcogenide Spinelsmentioning
confidence: 99%