2015
DOI: 10.1134/s1063773715070014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic propeller effect in the spectra of young stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are principal differences between UXORs and the RW Aur A case, namely, a much longer duration and a larger depth of eclipses, higher linear polarization and stability of its orientation during the eclipses. This indicates that if in the case of UXORs the eclipses are produced by relatively small clouds of circumstellar dust (Grinin 1988), then in the case of RW Aur A the eclipses are caused by a much more extended circumstellar dusty environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there are principal differences between UXORs and the RW Aur A case, namely, a much longer duration and a larger depth of eclipses, higher linear polarization and stability of its orientation during the eclipses. This indicates that if in the case of UXORs the eclipses are produced by relatively small clouds of circumstellar dust (Grinin 1988), then in the case of RW Aur A the eclipses are caused by a much more extended circumstellar dusty environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grinin (1988) and references therein] is clearly seen in the V −Rc, V −Ic colours and possibly present in the B −V colour. It is reasonable to assume that explanations of the effect in both cases are similar: as the star fades, the contribution of more blue light, scattered by the circumstellar dust, increases (Grinin 1988). However, the amplitude (∆V ≈ 5 mag) and duration (several years) of RW Aur A's dimmings are significantly larger than in the case of UXORs, which indicates that in our case, we dealing with suggestive of a larger scale phenomenon than an eclipse of the star by a relatively small dust cloud orbiting the star.…”
Section: Photometrymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These bursts are thought to be triggered by instabilities in the inner parts of the circumstellar disk (D'Angelo & Spruit 2010, 2012Armitage 2016). Observationally, EXor are quite rare systems, with only a few tens of examples known so far (see e.g., Audard et al 2014) and in some cases the classification is uncertain since the observed properties (burst amplitude, cadence, optical/IR colors) are attributable to accretion as well as to extinction episodes related to orbiting dust structures that move along the line of sight (UXors variables, Grinin 1988). These latter are more compatible with repeating brightness variations with the same period and amplitude, while more erratic variations favor the accretion hypothesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bursts of both classes are thought to be triggered by instabilities originating in the disk itself (Zhu et al 2009, D'Angelo & Spruit 2010, 2012, in particular in the inner connection region between star and disk. To have a more complete account for the scenario of the young variables, UXors objects must also be considered (Grinin 1988), whose brightness variations are related to orbiting dust structures that move along the line of sight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%