2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-010-9659-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Polarity Transitions and Biospheric Effects

Abstract: This review addresses possible biospheric effects of geomagnetic polarity transitions. During a transition the magnetic field at the surface of the Earth decreases to about 10% of its current value. If the geomagnetic field is a shield against energetic particles of solar or cosmic origin then biospheric effects can be expected. We review the early speculations on the problem and discuss in more detail its current status. We conclude that no clear picture of a geomagnetic link, a causal relation between secula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first highlights what makes the solar dynamo so different from the geodynamo (Petrovay and Christensen 2010), and the second discusses the possible biological consequences of a geomagnetic reversal, possibly the question most often asked of any geo-or paleomagnetician! In this final review, Glassmeier and Vogt (2010) reassuringly conclude that no evidence of major biological consequences related to previous reversals has yet been found. This being said, it is important to recall that the current decrease of the Earth's magnetic field, particularly in the South Atlantic (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The first highlights what makes the solar dynamo so different from the geodynamo (Petrovay and Christensen 2010), and the second discusses the possible biological consequences of a geomagnetic reversal, possibly the question most often asked of any geo-or paleomagnetician! In this final review, Glassmeier and Vogt (2010) reassuringly conclude that no evidence of major biological consequences related to previous reversals has yet been found. This being said, it is important to recall that the current decrease of the Earth's magnetic field, particularly in the South Atlantic (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Other events which could be relevant as inversions of the magnetic fields should also enter into consideration as they are studied now. (Glassmeier and Vogt 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include light, radiation, temperature, humidity, atmosphere, and soil structure and composition, which vary considerably with time and position over the Earth's surface [Larcher, ]. Likewise, Earth's magnetic field intensity more than doubles, increasing from 25 µT at the equator to 65 µT at the poles, while at the same time it changes direction and inclination vector with position, from parallel to perpendicular to the Earth's surface [Glassmeier and Vogt, ]. In addition, the Earth's magnetic field has been constantly changing over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%